FGR.PA vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
FGR.PA vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGR.PA vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGR.PA Eiffage SA | 10.87% | 50.01% | -9.11% | 9.25% | 5.05% | 18.20% | -22.51% | 43.56% | -18.50% | 40.56% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 10.91% | 31.47% | 48.28% | 68.18% | -29.41% | 52.76% | 42.71% | 68.17% | -4.78% | 21.46% |
Different Trading Currencies
FGR.PA is traded in EUR, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGR.PA having a 10.87% return and SMH slightly lower at 10.52%. Over the past 10 years, FGR.PA has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 10.16%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 31.47% annualized return.
FGR.PA
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 23.93%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 17.77%
- 1Y
- 71.92%
- 3Y*
- 41.97%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 31.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGR.PA vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FGR.PA
SMH
FGR.PA vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGR.PA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.87 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.45 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 4.16 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 15.24 | -10.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGR.PA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.87 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.79 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.98 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.69 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGR.PA and SMH is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGR.PA vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FGR.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than SMH's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGR.PA Eiffage SA | 3.46% | 3.84% | 4.84% | 3.71% | 3.37% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 2.35% | 2.74% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 2.02% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
FGR.PA vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGR.PA drawdown since its inception was -85.99%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -57.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGR.PA and SMH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGR.PA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.99% | -84.96% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -14.93% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -45.30% | +24.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.28% | -45.30% | -7.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.28% | -7.94% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -41.35% | +8.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 4.50% | +3.40% |
Volatility
FGR.PA vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) is 7.74%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that FGR.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGR.PA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 10.63% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 23.86% | -7.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 38.56% | -14.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 33.96% | -11.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 32.23% | -6.89% |