PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HST vs. HLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HST vs. HLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HST achieves a 44.41% return, which is significantly higher than HLT's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, HST has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 7.85%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 46.64% annualized return.


HST

1D
0.16%
1M
7.62%
6M
38.17%
YTD
44.41%
1Y
70.03%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
7.85%
ALL TIME*
4.72%

HLT

1D
-0.48%
1M
-5.21%
6M
7.46%
YTD
11.68%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
27.85%
5Y*
19.83%
10Y*
46.64%
ALL TIME*
36.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$673.09M$672.71M$663.95M
$220.34M$215.30M$220.39M

HST vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
44.41%7.21%-5.48%27.61%-4.62%18.87%-19.71%16.65%-12.15%10.22%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
11.68%16.49%36.11%44.68%-18.72%40.20%0.47%55.48%-9.40%829.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HST and HLT is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.61

The correlation between HST and HLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HST:

$17.21B

HLT:

$72.13B

EPS

HST:

$2.19

HLT:

$6.75

PE Ratio

HST:

11.50

HLT:

47.50

PS Ratio

HST:

1.89

HLT:

6.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

HST:

$6.17B

HLT:

$12.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HST:

$1.56B

HLT:

$5.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

HST:

$1.95B

HLT:

$2.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HST vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HST
HST Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HST Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HST Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

HLT
HLT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HST vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSTHLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.16

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.21

1.93

+5.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.95

4.25

+14.70

HST vs. HLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HST Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HST and HLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HST vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HST drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HST and HLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSTHLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.26%

-50.82%

-44.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-10.29%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.03%

-26.35%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

-32.65%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.04%

-50.82%

-4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-8.49%

+6.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.90%

-9.66%

-31.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

4.69%

-1.09%

Volatility

HST vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) is 6.29%, while Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that HST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSTHLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

6.92%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.62%

17.25%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.58%

23.28%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.18%

26.85%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.98%

180.98%

-147.00%

Dividends

HST vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison

HST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than HLT's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.19%0.21%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%31.40%1.03%0.65%
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
3.78%5.36%5.14%4.62%3.30%0.00%1.37%4.58%5.10%4.28%4.51%5.22%

Financials

HST vs. HLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

HST vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

HST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 3.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

HST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 319.00M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 858.00M and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

HST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 494.00M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 30.0%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 482.00M and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HST and HLT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLT has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to HST (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HST dropped -95.26% vs HLT's -50.82%.

HST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HST and HLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer