PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRTS vs. TOLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HRTS vs. TOLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF (TOLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HRTS vs. TOLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
-3.74%23.93%-4.30%14.97%
TOLL
Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF
-3.33%11.36%12.79%7.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTS achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than TOLL's -3.33% return.


HRTS

1D
0.84%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
8.13%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TOLL

1D
0.95%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
-3.33%
6M
-0.96%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HRTS vs. TOLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLL's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HRTS vs. TOLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTS
HRTS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLL
TOLL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TOLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLL Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRTS vs. TOLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF (TOLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HRTSTOLLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

0.32

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

0.61

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.08

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.54

+1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.72

1.97

+2.76

HRTS vs. TOLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the TOLL Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTS and TOLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HRTSTOLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.32

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.79

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between HRTS and TOLL is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HRTS vs. TOLL - Dividend Comparison

HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than TOLL's 0.33% yield.


TTM202520242023
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
1.39%1.34%1.63%0.00%
TOLL
Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF
0.33%0.32%1.99%0.36%

Drawdowns

HRTS vs. TOLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTS drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, which is greater than TOLL's maximum drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTS and TOLL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HRTSTOLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.81%

-15.54%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-11.83%

+0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.25%

-8.47%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-2.44%

-6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.23%

+0.46%

Volatility

HRTS vs. TOLL - Volatility Comparison

Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF (TOLL) at 5.57%. This indicates that HRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HRTSTOLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

5.57%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

10.56%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

19.19%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

15.75%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

15.75%

+3.52%