PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOLL vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TOLL vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF (TOLL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TOLL vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TOLL
Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF
-4.23%11.36%12.79%15.37%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-6.62%13.20%10.73%16.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOLL achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -6.62% return.


TOLL

1D
1.57%
1M
-7.88%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MOAT

1D
2.13%
1M
-9.57%
YTD
-6.62%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TOLL vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOLL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TOLL vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOLL
TOLL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TOLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOLL vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF (TOLL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOLLMOATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

0.58

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

0.97

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.13

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.88

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.92

3.37

-1.45

TOLL vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOLL and MOAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOLLMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

0.58

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.75

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between TOLL and MOAT is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TOLL vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

TOLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than MOAT's 1.45% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TOLL
Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF
0.33%0.32%1.99%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.45%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Drawdowns

TOLL vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOLL drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLL and MOAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TOLLMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.54%

-33.31%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-13.30%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

-10.19%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-3.79%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.49%

-0.30%

Volatility

TOLL vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF (TOLL) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.81%. This indicates that TOLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TOLLMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

4.81%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

10.12%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

19.76%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

18.10%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

18.71%

-2.95%