PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HRTG vs. GDXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HRTG vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTG achieves a -23.27% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -56.00% return.


HRTG

1D
0.58%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-23.27%
6M
-22.80%
1Y
-5.99%
3Y*
71.00%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
7.50%

GDXU

1D
8.84%
1M
-50.11%
YTD
-56.00%
6M
-55.92%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
37.87%
5Y*
-14.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HRTG vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HRTG
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
-23.27%141.82%85.58%262.22%-68.58%-40.09%-0.94%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-56.00%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HRTG and GDXU is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.10

The correlation between HRTG and GDXU shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HRTG vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTG
HRTG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HRTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRTG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HRTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HRTG vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HRTGGDXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.18

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

0.37

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

0.80

-1.21

HRTG vs. GDXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HRTG Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the GDXU Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTG and GDXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HRTG vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTG drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTG and GDXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HRTGGDXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-94.39%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.95%

-83.97%

+51.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.90%

-83.97%

+40.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.89%

-92.44%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.91%

-79.58%

+51.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.51%

-69.77%

+23.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.92%

38.59%

-23.67%

Volatility

HRTG vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) is 10.07%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 54.28%. This indicates that HRTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HRTGGDXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

54.28%

-44.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.66%

123.72%

-86.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.07%

142.00%

-84.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.35%

111.92%

-40.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.93%

110.82%

-52.89%

Dividends

HRTG vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison

Neither HRTG nor GDXU has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HRTG
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.67%4.08%2.37%1.81%1.63%1.33%1.47%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


HRTG and GDXU have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to HRTG (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HRTG dropped -94.36% vs GDXU's -94.39%.

GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HRTG and GDXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer