HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO
HR-UN.TO (H&R Real Estate Investment Trust) and ATZ.TO (Aritzia Inc.) are both stocks. HR-UN.TO operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate), while ATZ.TO operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, HR-UN.TO returned -5.16%/yr vs 39.86%/yr for ATZ.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HR-UN.TO achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than ATZ.TO's 37.20% return.
HR-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- -5.16%
- 10Y*
- -3.00%
ATZ.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 8.72%
- YTD
- 37.20%
- 6M
- 42.11%
- 1Y
- 133.23%
- 3Y*
- 64.57%
- 5Y*
- 39.86%
- 10Y*
- —
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR-UN.TO H&R Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.04% | 16.66% | -5.21% | -12.55% | -21.84% | 22.36% | -33.30% | 7.10% | 1.85% | 0.19% |
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc. | 37.20% | 119.59% | 94.33% | -41.92% | -9.55% | 102.99% | 35.38% | 16.16% | 29.24% | -27.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HR-UN.TO and ATZ.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
HR-UN.TO:
CA$2.72B
ATZ.TO:
CA$19.35B
HR-UN.TO:
-CA$2.94
ATZ.TO:
CA$3.19
HR-UN.TO:
3.41
ATZ.TO:
5.20
HR-UN.TO:
0.66
ATZ.TO:
14.22
HR-UN.TO:
CA$793.74M
ATZ.TO:
CA$3.70B
HR-UN.TO:
CA$490.73M
ATZ.TO:
CA$1.65B
HR-UN.TO:
-CA$804.22M
ATZ.TO:
CA$736.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HR-UN.TO
ATZ.TO
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR-UN.TO) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HR-UN.TO | ATZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.53 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 5.85 | -5.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 16.55 | -16.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HR-UN.TO | ATZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 3.67 | -3.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.86 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.60 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HR-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.31%, which is greater than ATZ.TO's maximum drawdown of -64.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HR-UN.TO and ATZ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HR-UN.TO | ATZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.31% | -64.82% | -16.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.45% | -23.22% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -46.84% | +23.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.85% | -64.82% | +17.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.18% | 0.00% | -42.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.19% | -20.15% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.11% | 8.19% | +2.92% |
Volatility
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR-UN.TO) is 5.05%, while Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that HR-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HR-UN.TO | ATZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 12.90% | -7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 30.47% | -18.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 37.05% | -11.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 46.69% | -22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 43.03% | -16.12% |
Dividends
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Dividend Comparison
HR-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, while ATZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HR-UN.TO H&R Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.83% | 5.87% | 8.03% | 7.07% | 4.87% | 3.87% | 5.36% | 5.04% | 5.15% | 4.98% | 4.68% | 4.78% |
Financials
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H&R Real Estate Investment Trust and Aritzia Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HR-UN.TO vs. ATZ.TO - Profitability Comparison
HR-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 79.24M and revenue of 184.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.0%.
ATZ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a gross profit of 507.19M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.
HR-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 82.52M and revenue of 184.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.8%.
ATZ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported an operating income of 183.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
HR-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -34.87M and revenue of 184.25M, resulting in a net margin of -18.9%.
ATZ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a net income of 134.27M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HR-UN.TO and ATZ.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HR-UN.TO and ATZ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer