PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR-UN.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HR-UN.TO achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than SRU-UN.TO's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, HR-UN.TO has underperformed SRU-UN.TO with an annualized return of -3.00%, while SRU-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 4.73% annualized return.


HR-UN.TO

1D
-0.77%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
3.04%
6M
5.82%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
-5.16%
10Y*
-3.00%

SRU-UN.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
1.44%
YTD
15.56%
6M
18.65%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
4.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HR-UN.TO
H&R Real Estate Investment Trust
3.04%16.66%-5.21%-12.55%-21.84%22.36%-33.30%7.10%1.85%0.19%
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
15.56%13.10%6.13%0.16%-11.27%48.64%-19.65%6.97%5.77%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2001

0.50

The correlation between HR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HR-UN.TO:

CA$2.72B

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$4.93B

EPS

HR-UN.TO:

-CA$2.94

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$2.10

PS Ratio

HR-UN.TO:

3.41

SRU-UN.TO:

5.40

PB Ratio

HR-UN.TO:

0.66

SRU-UN.TO:

0.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

HR-UN.TO:

CA$793.74M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$929.78M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HR-UN.TO:

CA$490.73M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$565.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

HR-UN.TO:

-CA$804.22M

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$628.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HR-UN.TO
HR-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HR-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HR-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HR-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HR-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SRU-UN.TO
SRU-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR-UN.TO) and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HR-UN.TOSRU-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.31

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

3.29

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

9.46

-9.21

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HR-UN.TOSRU-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

1.86

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.44

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

0.22

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.35

-0.16

Drawdowns

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HR-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.31%, which is greater than SRU-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HR-UN.TOSRU-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.31%

-68.25%

-13.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.45%

-6.39%

-13.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-14.34%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.85%

-28.89%

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.94%

-54.78%

-12.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.18%

-0.40%

-41.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.19%

-10.98%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.11%

2.22%

+8.89%

Volatility

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) at 3.08%. This indicates that HR-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRU-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HR-UN.TOSRU-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

3.08%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

8.12%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.94%

11.30%

+14.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.52%

16.21%

+8.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.91%

21.54%

+5.37%

Dividends

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

HR-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than SRU-UN.TO's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HR-UN.TO
H&R Real Estate Investment Trust
5.83%5.87%8.03%7.07%4.87%3.87%5.36%5.04%5.15%4.98%4.68%4.78%
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
6.39%7.18%7.56%7.42%6.90%5.74%8.01%5.81%5.72%5.55%5.17%5.34%

Financials

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H&R Real Estate Investment Trust and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


180.00M200.00M220.00M240.00M260.00M20222023202420252026
184.25M
231.84M
(HR-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(SRU-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

HR-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between H&R Real Estate Investment Trust and SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
43.0%
59.4%
Portfolio components
HR-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 79.24M and revenue of 184.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.0%.

SRU-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 137.69M and revenue of 231.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

HR-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 82.52M and revenue of 184.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.8%.

SRU-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 126.18M and revenue of 231.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.4%.

HR-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -34.87M and revenue of 184.25M, resulting in a net margin of -18.9%.

SRU-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 105.33M and revenue of 231.84M, resulting in a net margin of 45.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HR-UN.TO and SRU-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer