PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HR-UN.TO vs. BN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR-UN.TO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HR-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while BN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HR-UN.TO achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, HR-UN.TO has underperformed BN with an annualized return of -3.00%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.73% annualized return.


HR-UN.TO

1D
-0.77%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
3.04%
6M
5.82%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
-5.16%
10Y*
-3.00%

BN

1D
-0.79%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-3.37%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
30.72%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
15.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HR-UN.TO
H&R Real Estate Investment Trust
3.04%16.66%-5.21%-12.55%-21.84%22.36%-33.30%7.10%1.85%0.19%
BN
Brookfield Corporation
-1.10%15.01%56.56%25.77%-30.16%47.95%7.15%45.17%-3.08%25.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HR-UN.TO and BN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009

0.35

The correlation between HR-UN.TO and BN shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HR-UN.TO:

CA$2.72B

BN:

$105.57B

EPS

HR-UN.TO:

-CA$2.94

BN:

$0.56

PS Ratio

HR-UN.TO:

3.41

BN:

1.38

PB Ratio

HR-UN.TO:

0.66

BN:

2.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

HR-UN.TO:

CA$793.74M

BN:

$76.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HR-UN.TO:

CA$490.73M

BN:

$27.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

HR-UN.TO:

-CA$804.22M

BN:

$31.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HR-UN.TO vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HR-UN.TO
HR-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HR-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HR-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HR-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HR-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BN
BN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR-UN.TO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HR-UN.TOBNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.13

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.80

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

2.26

-2.01

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HR-UN.TO and BN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HR-UN.TOBNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

0.65

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.52

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

0.57

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.74

-0.55

Drawdowns

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HR-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.31%, which is greater than BN's maximum drawdown of -46.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HR-UN.TO and BN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HR-UN.TOBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.31%

-46.89%

-34.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.45%

-22.59%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-28.93%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.85%

-36.79%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.94%

-46.89%

-20.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.18%

-8.32%

-33.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.19%

-7.98%

-9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.11%

7.98%

+3.13%

Volatility

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR-UN.TO) is 5.05%, while Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that HR-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HR-UN.TOBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

9.52%

-4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

21.95%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.94%

27.97%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.52%

28.82%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.91%

27.87%

-0.96%

Dividends

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Dividend Comparison

HR-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than BN's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BN
Brookfield Corporation
0.56%0.52%0.56%0.70%1.44%1.12%1.55%1.11%1.56%1.29%1.58%1.50%
HR-UN.TO
H&R Real Estate Investment Trust
5.83%5.87%8.03%7.07%4.87%3.87%5.36%5.04%5.15%4.98%4.68%4.78%

Financials

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H&R Real Estate Investment Trust and Brookfield Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
184.25M
18.39B
(HR-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(BN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HR-UN.TO values in CAD, BN values in USD

HR-UN.TO vs. BN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between H&R Real Estate Investment Trust and Brookfield Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
43.0%
24.1%
Portfolio components
HR-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 79.24M and revenue of 184.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.0%.

BN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 18.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

HR-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 82.52M and revenue of 184.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.8%.

BN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.39B and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

HR-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H&R Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -34.87M and revenue of 184.25M, resulting in a net margin of -18.9%.

BN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.59M and revenue of 18.39B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HR-UN.TO and BN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HR-UN.TO and BN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer