HOVR vs. FNGS
HOVR (New Horizon Aircraft Ltd) is a stock, while FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Over the past year, HOVR returned 144.66% vs 32.20% for FNGS. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HOVR vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOVR achieves a 71.43% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 17.41% return.
HOVR
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 71.43%
- 6M
- 65.79%
- 1Y
- 144.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 12.77%
- YTD
- 17.41%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 35.74%
- 5Y*
- 22.72%
- 10Y*
- —
HOVR vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HOVR New Horizon Aircraft Ltd | 71.43% | 30.09% | -66.37% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 17.41% | 18.64% | 51.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOVR and FNGS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024 | 0.18 |
The correlation between HOVR and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOVR vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
HOVR
FNGS
HOVR vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Horizon Aircraft Ltd (HOVR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOVR | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.58 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 2.17 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 1.47 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 4.25 | -0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOVR | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.58 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 1.06 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
HOVR vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOVR drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOVR and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOVR | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.26% | -48.98% | -43.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.31% | -22.93% | -46.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.55% | -0.64% | -34.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.93% | -10.87% | -50.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.27% | 7.92% | +34.35% |
Volatility
HOVR vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
New Horizon Aircraft Ltd (HOVR) has a higher volatility of 48.99% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 5.42%. This indicates that HOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOVR | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.99% | 5.42% | +43.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.52% | 15.65% | +65.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 128.99% | 20.49% | +108.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 157.72% | 29.96% | +127.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 157.72% | 31.13% | +126.59% |
Dividends
HOVR vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOVR nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HOVR and FNGS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOVR has higher volatility (48.99%) compared to FNGS (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOVR dropped -92.26% vs FNGS's -48.98%.
FNGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOVR and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer