PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOVR vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOVR vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Horizon Aircraft Ltd (HOVR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOVR achieves a 17.01% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 29.28% return.


HOVR

1D
-1.15%
1M
-11.34%
6M
-7.53%
YTD
17.01%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.83%

QTUM

1D
0.67%
1M
-8.88%
6M
22.33%
YTD
29.28%
1Y
57.72%
3Y*
39.51%
5Y*
24.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.48M$2.30M$5.51M
$54.21M$61.13M$111.15M

HOVR vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HOVR
New Horizon Aircraft Ltd
17.01%30.09%-70.26%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
29.28%36.65%52.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HOVR and QTUM is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024

0.30

Over the past year, HOVR and QTUM have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOVR vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOVR
HOVR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOVR vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Horizon Aircraft Ltd (HOVR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOVRQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

2.57

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

9.41

-9.10

HOVR vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOVR and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOVR vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOVR drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOVR and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOVRQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.16%

-38.45%

-54.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.31%

-21.51%

-47.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.01%

-16.16%

-39.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.90%

-8.27%

-54.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.99%

5.87%

+39.12%

Volatility

HOVR vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

New Horizon Aircraft Ltd (HOVR) has a higher volatility of 31.60% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 11.38%. This indicates that HOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOVRQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.60%

11.38%

+20.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.59%

26.47%

+51.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.08%

31.67%

+86.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

154.49%

27.69%

+126.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

154.49%

27.69%

+126.80%

Dividends

HOVR vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

HOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HOVR
New Horizon Aircraft Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.83%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOVR and QTUM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOVR has higher volatility (31.60%) compared to QTUM (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOVR dropped -93.16% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOVR and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer