HOOX vs. QTAP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HOOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOX returned -62.32% vs 20.30% for QTAP. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HOOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

HOOX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -61.28% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.57% return.

HOOX

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: -43.66%
• 6M: -48.06%
• YTD: -61.28%
• 1Y: -62.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 48.40%

QTAP

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 12.76%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	$1.57M	$2.40M	$2.98M
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	$235.81K	$225.86K	$220.48K

HOOX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	-61.28%	342.84%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	13.57%	20.39%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and QTAP is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	0.54

The correlation between HOOX and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

HOOX vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOOX	QTAP
Financial Services	100.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.7%
Energy	-	0.7%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Industrials	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	50.7%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

HOOX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HOOX

HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 6
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HOOX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOX	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	2.95	-3.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	4.74	-4.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.69	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	6.93	-7.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	33.23	-34.29

HOOX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOX and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOX	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.11%	-29.44%	-57.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-87.11%	-2.81%	-84.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.07%	-1.05%	-81.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.66%	-4.91%	-36.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	61.09%	0.59%	+60.50%

Volatility

HOOX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 35.55% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.75%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOX	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.55%	2.75%	+32.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	107.95%	5.69%	+102.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.66%	6.61%	+134.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.29%	18.92%	+124.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.29%	18.57%	+124.72%

HOOX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.47%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	36.47%	14.12%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOX and QTAP in my portfolio?

HOOX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOX or QTAP?

HOOX has higher volatility (35.55%) compared to QTAP (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, HOOX or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 20.30% vs -62.32% for HOOX. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOX or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 20.30% return vs -62.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOX or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOX or QTAP?

HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 36.47%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between HOOX and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.