HOOX vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HOOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HOOX is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOX returned -31.77% vs 156.99% for NRGU. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

HOOX vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -60.76% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 129.31% return.

HOOX

• 1D: -12.45%
• 1M: 10.42%
• YTD: -60.76%
• 6M: -72.98%
• 1Y: -31.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -6.67%
• YTD: 129.31%
• 6M: 97.01%
• 1Y: 156.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOX vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	-60.76%	312.21%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	129.31%	-26.97%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and NRGU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.03

The correlation between HOOX and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HOOX vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOOX	NRGU
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HOOX vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOX

HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 58
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 48
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOX vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HOOX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	2.11	-2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.43	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.30	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	3.95	-4.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	9.88	-10.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HOOX vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOX and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOOX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	2.11	-2.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.45	-0.11

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOX	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.11%	-57.50%	-29.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-87.11%	-39.95%	-47.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.84%	-20.91%	-60.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.46%	-25.42%	-12.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.44%	15.96%	+37.48%

Volatility

HOOX vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 41.73% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 31.63%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOX	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.73%	31.63%	+10.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.05%	61.27%	+39.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	137.62%	75.15%	+62.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.08%	89.15%	+54.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.08%	89.15%	+54.93%

HOOX vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOX vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.99%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	35.99%	14.12%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOX and NRGU in my portfolio?

HOOX and NRGU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOX or NRGU?

HOOX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to NRGU (31.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, HOOX or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 156.99% vs -31.77% for HOOX. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 31.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOX or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 156.99% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOX or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOX or NRGU?

HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 35.99%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between HOOX and NRGU?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.