PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOX vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOX vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -41.20% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


HOOX

1D
-4.60%
1M
83.42%
YTD
-41.20%
6M
-48.54%
1Y
-7.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOX vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOX and LINT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.25

HOOX vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOOX
LINT

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

HOOX
100.0%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Energy

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Industrials

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Technology

HOOX

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

HOOX

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOX vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOX
HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOX vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOXLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.13

HOOX vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOX vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOXLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.11%

-49.54%

-37.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-87.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.78%

-12.86%

-59.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.95%

-20.48%

-18.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.21%

Volatility

HOOX vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOXLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.87%

168.83%

-28.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

143.98%

168.83%

-24.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.98%

168.83%

-24.85%

HOOX vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOX vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.02%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOOX and LINT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 24.02%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOX and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer