HOOX vs. BNO
HOOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. HOOX is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, HOOX returned -31.77% vs 91.89% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. HOOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
HOOX vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOX achieves a -60.76% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.
HOOX
- 1D
- -12.45%
- 1M
- 10.42%
- YTD
- -60.76%
- 6M
- -72.98%
- 1Y
- -31.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
HOOX vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | -60.76% | 312.21% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOX and BNO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOX vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
HOOX
BNO
HOOX vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOOX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.38 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 5.17 | -5.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 9.76 | -10.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOOX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 2.23 | -2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.14 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
HOOX vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOX drawdown since its inception was -87.11%, roughly equal to the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOX and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.11% | -87.06% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.11% | -17.87% | -69.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.84% | -10.29% | -71.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.46% | -40.17% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.44% | 9.45% | +43.99% |
Volatility
HOOX vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a higher volatility of 41.73% compared to United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) at 14.22%. This indicates that HOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.73% | 14.22% | +27.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.05% | 36.10% | +64.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.62% | 41.46% | +96.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.08% | 35.38% | +108.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.08% | 36.68% | +107.40% |
HOOX vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOX vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
HOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.99%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | 35.99% | 14.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOX and BNO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOX has higher volatility (41.73%) compared to BNO (14.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOX dropped -87.11% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 91.89% vs -31.77% for HOOX. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BNO has been the lower-risk option at 14.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 91.89% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.
HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 35.99%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
HOOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HOOX and 0.90% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOX and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer