PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOW vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOW vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HOOW

1D
-2.94%
1M
47.20%
YTD
-14.70%
6M
-20.92%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRAM

1D
-14.25%
1M
31.05%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and DRAM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.38

HOOW vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOOW
DRAM

Financial Services

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

HOOW
3.5%
DRAM

-

Basic Materials

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Communication Services

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Cyclical

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Defensive

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Energy

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Healthcare

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Industrials

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Real Estate

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Technology

HOOW

-

DRAM
100.0%

Utilities

HOOW

-

DRAM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOW vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW
HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOWDRAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

HOOW vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOWDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.74%

-19.97%

-45.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.07%

-14.25%

-27.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-3.09%

-26.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.05%

Volatility

HOOW vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOWDRAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.38%

93.22%

-8.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.14%

93.22%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.14%

93.22%

-9.08%

HOOW vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOW vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 136.33%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
136.33%67.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOW and DRAM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 136.33%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOW and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer