HOOG vs. XTJL
HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOG returned -45.56% vs 13.86% for XTJL. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
HOOG vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -40.04% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.97% return.
HOOG
- 1D
- -16.65%
- 1M
- 13.72%
- 6M
- -36.00%
- YTD
- -40.04%
- 1Y
- -45.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 13.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- —
HOOG vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -40.04% | 320.19% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.97% | 16.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOG and XTJL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between HOOG and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOG vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
HOOG
XTJL
HOOG vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.41 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.72 | -3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 15.38 | -16.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOG vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.94% | -23.24% | -63.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.94% | -5.12% | -81.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.03% | -0.42% | -71.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.55% | -3.95% | -36.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.70% | 0.90% | +57.80% |
Volatility
HOOG vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 40.77% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 1.39%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.77% | 1.39% | +39.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 106.02% | 5.73% | +100.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.20% | 7.40% | +131.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.48% | 15.10% | +129.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.48% | 15.05% | +129.43% |
HOOG vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOOG vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.52%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 20.52% | 12.30% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOG and XTJL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOG has higher volatility (40.77%) compared to XTJL (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 13.86% vs -45.56% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 13.86% return vs -45.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJL.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 20.52%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOG and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer