PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJL vs. HIMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than HIMZ's -58.87% return.


XTJL

1D
0.01%
1M
1.06%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.58%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*

HIMZ

1D
-2.03%
1M
-8.46%
YTD
-58.87%
6M
-68.47%
1Y
-94.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and HIMZ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.42

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTJL
HIMZ

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
100.0%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XTJL
36.2%
HIMZ

-

Financial Services

XTJL
11.9%
HIMZ

-

Communication Services

XTJL
10.9%
HIMZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

XTJL
10.1%
HIMZ

-

Healthcare

XTJL
8.4%
HIMZ

-

Industrials

XTJL
8.1%
HIMZ

-

Consumer Defensive

XTJL
4.9%
HIMZ
100.0%

Energy

XTJL
3.5%
HIMZ

-

Utilities

XTJL
2.3%
HIMZ

-

Real Estate

XTJL
1.9%
HIMZ

-

Basic Materials

XTJL
1.8%
HIMZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTJL vs. HIMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMZ
HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTJLHIMZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

-0.49

+2.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

-0.65

+3.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.92

+0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

-0.96

+4.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.27

-1.19

+19.46

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the HIMZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and HIMZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTJLHIMZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

-0.49

+2.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

-0.40

+1.04

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum HIMZ drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and HIMZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJLHIMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-98.18%

+74.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-98.04%

+92.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-95.53%

+95.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-68.81%

+64.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

78.93%

-78.03%

Volatility

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 0.36%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a volatility of 53.92%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTJLHIMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

53.92%

-53.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

131.54%

-125.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

191.74%

-184.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

200.67%

-185.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

200.67%

-185.44%

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMZ's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTJL vs. HIMZ - Dividend Comparison

XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XTJL and HIMZ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMZ has higher volatility (53.92%) compared to XTJL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs HIMZ's -98.18%.

On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 16.14% vs -94.03% for HIMZ. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 16.14% return vs -94.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.

HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 1.31% for HIMZ.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTJL and HIMZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer