PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOG vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -40.69% return, which is significantly lower than RTXG's -4.29% return.


HOOG

1D
-4.87%
1M
83.12%
YTD
-40.69%
6M
-48.04%
1Y
-5.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RTXG

1D
5.07%
1M
9.01%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-6.71%
1Y
41.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and RTXG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOG vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXG
RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOGRTXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

1.11

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

2.78

-2.87

HOOG vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the RTXG Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and RTXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOGRTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.94%

-37.49%

-49.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

-37.49%

-49.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.34%

-26.83%

-45.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.04%

-9.63%

-29.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.98%

14.97%

+41.01%

Volatility

HOOG vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 46.61% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) at 18.81%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOGRTXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.61%

18.81%

+27.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.92%

38.71%

+63.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.38%

50.00%

+89.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.74%

50.19%

+94.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.74%

50.19%

+94.55%

HOOG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOOG and RTXG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

HOOG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.75%, more than RTXG's 6.65% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOOG and RTXG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (46.61%) compared to RTXG (18.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs RTXG's -37.49%.

On 1-year performance, RTXG leads with 41.48% vs -5.11% for HOOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, RTXG has been the lower-risk option at 18.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RTXG has performed better with a 41.48% return vs -5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG and RTXG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 20.75%, compared with 6.65% for RTXG.

RTXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOG and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer