PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTXG vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTXG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTXG achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 230.68% return.


RTXG

1D
0.90%
1M
15.56%
6M
5.40%
YTD
24.96%
1Y
63.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
83.56%

AMDG

1D
-3.81%
1M
-20.14%
6M
179.34%
YTD
230.68%
1Y
319.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
243.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.00M$7.90M$8.98M
$945.29K$642.88K$633.54K

RTXG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RTXG and AMDG is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTXG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTXG
RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTXG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTXGAMDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

5.31

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

9.98

-6.19

RTXG vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTXG and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTXG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTXG drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, smaller than the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXG and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTXGAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.49%

-63.32%

+25.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.49%

-56.48%

+18.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-37.43%

+32.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.35%

-25.05%

+14.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.21%

29.98%

-13.77%

Volatility

RTXG vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) is 18.65%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 49.04%. This indicates that RTXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTXGAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.65%

49.04%

-30.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.50%

113.22%

-72.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.89%

142.79%

-90.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.21%

135.20%

-83.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.21%

135.20%

-83.99%

RTXG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RTXG and AMDG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

RTXG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than AMDG's 3.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RTXG and AMDG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDG has higher volatility (49.04%) compared to RTXG (18.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTXG dropped -37.49% vs AMDG's -63.32%.

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 319.90% vs 63.09% for RTXG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, RTXG has been the lower-risk option at 18.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 319.90% return vs 63.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RTXG and AMDG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 3.39% for AMDG.

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTXG and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer