PTIR vs. TQQQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - PTIR tracks the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -56.45% vs 56.87% for TQQQ. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PTIR charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -62.18% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return.

PTIR

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -11.63%
• 6M: -43.20%
• YTD: -62.18%
• 1Y: -56.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 164.95%

TQQQ

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -11.90%
• 6M: 20.14%
• YTD: 23.06%
• 1Y: 56.87%
• 3Y*: 43.81%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 39.46%
• ALL TIME*: 42.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	$34.43M	$50.90M	$65.92M
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	$4.37B	$4.57B	$5.33B

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-62.18%	221.36%	425.36%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	23.06%	34.35%	27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and TQQQ is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.51

The correlation between PTIR and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTIR	TQQQ
Technology	100.0%	53.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 4
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIR	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	0.83	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	1.38	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.17	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	1.29	-2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	3.60	-4.81

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.40%	-81.66%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.40%	-36.97%	-42.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.93%	-25.74%	-48.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-18.49%	-12.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.56%	13.24%	+35.32%

Volatility

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 27.36% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 20.41%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.36%	20.41%	+6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	81.50%	47.79%	+33.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.45%	57.62%	+46.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.66%	68.04%	+59.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.66%	66.57%	+61.09%

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIR vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, more than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	15.36%	5.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.58%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIR and TQQQ in my portfolio?

PTIR and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIR or TQQQ?

PTIR has higher volatility (27.36%) compared to TQQQ (20.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which ETF is better, PTIR or TQQQ?

On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 56.87% vs -56.45% for PTIR. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 20.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIR or TQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 56.87% return vs -56.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIR or TQQQ?

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIR or TQQQ?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 0.58% for TQQQ.

What is the main difference between PTIR and TQQQ?

PTIR tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 0.95% for TQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.