PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOG vs. GOEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOG vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -40.04% return, which is significantly lower than GOEX's -17.79% return.


HOOG

1D
-16.65%
1M
13.72%
6M
-36.00%
YTD
-40.04%
1Y
-45.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOEX

1D
-3.86%
1M
-17.60%
6M
-27.20%
YTD
-17.79%
1Y
49.00%
3Y*
37.49%
5Y*
18.44%
10Y*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOG vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-40.04%320.19%
GOEX
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
-17.79%119.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and GOEX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOG vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GOEX
GOEX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOOGGOEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.19

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

1.24

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.78

2.82

-3.59

HOOG vs. GOEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the GOEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and GOEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, roughly equal to the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and GOEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOGGOEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.94%

-88.83%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

-39.64%

-47.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.03%

-39.33%

-32.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-63.36%

+22.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

58.70%

17.46%

+41.24%

Volatility

HOOG vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 40.77% compared to Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) at 14.42%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOGGOEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.77%

14.42%

+26.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.02%

42.85%

+63.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.20%

52.43%

+86.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.48%

39.86%

+104.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.48%

40.19%

+104.29%

HOOG vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOOG vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.52%, more than GOEX's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOEX
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
2.67%2.08%2.46%0.05%1.04%2.35%2.62%1.60%0.00%0.00%38.91%11.70%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
20.52%12.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOOG and GOEX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (40.77%) compared to GOEX (14.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs GOEX's -88.83%.

On 1-year performance, GOEX leads with 49.00% vs -45.56% for HOOG. On fees, GOEX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GOEX has been the lower-risk option at 14.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 49.00% return vs -45.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOEX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HOOG.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 20.52%, compared with 2.67% for GOEX.

HOOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GOEX is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 0.65% for GOEX.

GOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOG and GOEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer