GOEX vs. SIL
GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOEX is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GOEX returned 12.52%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for SIL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
GOEX vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GOEX has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 12.52%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.
GOEX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 6M
- -11.26%
- 1Y
- 67.83%
- 3Y*
- 49.11%
- 5Y*
- 20.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
SIL
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -4.65%
- 1Y
- 76.80%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
GOEX vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -6.42% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -0.54% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOEX and SIL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GOEX and SIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
GOEX vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GOEX
SIL
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GOEX
SIL
Industrials
GOEX
SIL
-
Communication Services
GOEX
-
SIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
GOEX
-
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
GOEX
-
SIL
Energy
GOEX
-
SIL
-
Financial Services
GOEX
-
SIL
-
Healthcare
GOEX
-
SIL
-
Real Estate
GOEX
-
SIL
-
Technology
GOEX
-
SIL
-
Utilities
GOEX
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOEX vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
GOEX
SIL
GOEX vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOEX | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.08 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 5.34 | -0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOEX vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, which is greater than SIL's maximum drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOEX | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.83% | -82.99% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.64% | -37.08% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -37.08% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -49.83% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.66% | -63.04% | +9.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.93% | -29.62% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.48% | -51.38% | -12.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 14.42% | +0.35% |
Volatility
GOEX vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) have volatilities of 17.87% and 18.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOEX | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.87% | 18.75% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.43% | 44.09% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.38% | 52.38% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 39.76% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.19% | 39.87% | +0.32% |
GOEX vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GOEX and SIL have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
GOEX vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than SIL's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.22% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.19% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GOEX and SIL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SIL has higher volatility (18.75%) compared to GOEX (17.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 12.52% vs 9.25% for SIL. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, GOEX has been the lower-risk option at 17.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOEX and SIL have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.19% for SIL.
GOEX is categorized as Gold, while SIL is Silver. GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOEX and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer