PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOG vs. EEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HOOG vs. EEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HOOG vs. EEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -68.49% return, which is significantly lower than EEV's -9.92% return.


HOOG

1D
12.50%
1M
-20.36%
YTD
-68.49%
6M
-83.51%
1Y
42.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EEV

1D
-7.55%
1M
17.84%
YTD
-9.92%
6M
-16.06%
1Y
-44.96%
3Y*
-23.86%
5Y*
-9.60%
10Y*
-20.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HOOG vs. EEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EEV's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HOOG vs. EEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

EEV
EEV Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEV Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEV Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. EEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOOGEEVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.30

-1.12

+1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

-1.76

+3.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.79

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

-0.70

+1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.00

-0.98

+1.97

HOOG vs. EEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the EEV Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and EEV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOGEEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

-1.12

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.45

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and EEV is -0.47. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

HOOG vs. EEV - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.05%, more than EEV's 4.80% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
39.05%12.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
4.80%5.40%4.45%3.45%0.27%0.00%0.14%1.34%0.38%

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. EEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, smaller than the maximum EEV drawdown of -99.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and EEV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOGEEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.94%

-99.83%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

-64.05%

-22.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.30%

-99.80%

+14.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-92.94%

+62.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.02%

45.95%

-4.93%

Volatility

HOOG vs. EEV - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 35.72% compared to ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) at 21.55%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HOOGEEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.72%

21.55%

+14.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.26%

30.23%

+71.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

143.11%

40.32%

+102.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

143.89%

37.24%

+106.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.89%

40.75%

+103.14%