EEV vs. AMDG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EEV is passively managed, while AMDG is actively managed. Over the past year, EEV returned -61.41% vs 966.90% for AMDG. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. EEV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.

Performance

EEV vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -45.94% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 384.47% return.

EEV

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -17.55%
• YTD: -45.94%
• 6M: -47.26%
• 1Y: -61.41%
• 3Y*: -35.92%
• 5Y*: -17.45%
• 10Y*: -24.94%

AMDG

• 1D: 4.82%
• 1M: 30.80%
• YTD: 384.47%
• 6M: 379.60%
• 1Y: 966.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEV vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets	-45.94%	-41.53%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	384.47%	95.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EEV and AMDG is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	-0.60

The correlation between EEV and AMDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EEV vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEV

EEV Risk / Return Rank: 0
EEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
EEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
EEV Omega Ratio Rank: 0
EEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
EEV Martin Ratio Rank: 0

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEV vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEV	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.39	7.29	-8.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.56	4.26	-6.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.57	-0.86
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	17.30	-18.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.83	33.56	-35.39

EEV vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEV Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEV and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEV vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and AMDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEV	AMDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.88%	-63.32%	-36.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.74%	-56.48%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-77.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.88%	-1.34%	-98.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-93.00%	-25.43%	-67.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.52%	29.05%	+5.47%

Volatility

EEV vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) is 21.49%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 46.43%. This indicates that EEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEV	AMDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.49%	46.43%	-24.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.02%	101.85%	-61.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.39%	134.21%	-89.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.16%	132.22%	-93.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.49%	132.22%	-90.73%

EEV vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEV vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than AMDG's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	2.31%	11.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets	8.00%	5.40%	4.45%	3.45%	0.27%	0.00%	0.14%	1.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEV and AMDG in my portfolio?

EEV and AMDG have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEV or AMDG?

AMDG has higher volatility (46.43%) compared to EEV (21.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEV dropped -99.88% vs AMDG's -63.32%.

Which ETF is better, EEV or AMDG?

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 966.90% vs -61.41% for EEV. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EEV has been the lower-risk option at 21.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEV or AMDG?

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 966.90% return vs -61.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEV or AMDG?

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EEV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEV or AMDG?

EEV has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 2.31% for AMDG.

What is the main difference between EEV and AMDG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EEV and 0.75% for AMDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.