PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOD vs. XIACY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HOOD vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOD achieves a -17.60% return, which is significantly higher than XIACY's -33.94% return.


HOOD

1D
1.04%
1M
15.48%
YTD
-17.60%
6M
-22.02%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
113.32%
5Y*
10Y*

XIACY

1D
0.36%
1M
-17.62%
YTD
-33.94%
6M
-38.82%
1Y
-49.35%
3Y*
33.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOD vs. XIACY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HOOD
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
-17.60%203.54%192.46%56.51%-54.17%-53.26%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
-33.94%15.23%118.16%45.75%-42.42%-30.28%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOD and XIACY is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HOOD:

$85.27B

XIACY:

$88.03B

EPS

HOOD:

$2.07

XIACY:

CN¥6.64

PE Ratio

HOOD:

45.04

XIACY:

16.98

PEG Ratio

HOOD:

0.00

XIACY:

0.11

PS Ratio

HOOD:

21.83

XIACY:

1.35

PB Ratio

HOOD:

8.80

XIACY:

2.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

HOOD:

$3.91B

XIACY:

CN¥442.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HOOD:

$2.86B

XIACY:

CN¥97.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

HOOD:

$1.80B

XIACY:

CN¥40.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOD vs. XIACY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOD
HOOD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XIACY
XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOD vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOODXIACYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.77

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

-0.87

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

-1.43

+2.26

HOOD vs. XIACY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOD Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the XIACY Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOD and XIACY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOOD vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOD drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, which is greater than XIACY's maximum drawdown of -71.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOD and XIACY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOODXIACYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.21%

-71.03%

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.26%

-58.00%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.26%

-58.00%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.88%

-57.85%

+18.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.85%

-39.31%

-21.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.69%

35.09%

-3.40%

Volatility

HOOD vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a higher volatility of 23.07% compared to Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) at 10.81%. This indicates that HOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIACY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOODXIACYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.07%

10.81%

+12.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.85%

26.89%

+23.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.33%

39.10%

+30.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.06%

46.49%

+27.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.06%

46.49%

+27.57%

Dividends

HOOD vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison

Neither HOOD nor XIACY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

HOOD vs. XIACY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Xiaomi Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
359.00M
98.54B
(HOOD) Total Revenue
(XIACY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HOOD values in USD, XIACY values in CNY

HOOD vs. XIACY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Xiaomi Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
22.0%
Portfolio components
HOOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

XIACY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 98.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

HOOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

XIACY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

HOOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Robinhood Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 346.00M and revenue of 359.00M, resulting in a net margin of 96.4%.

XIACY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 4.69B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOOD and XIACY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOD has higher volatility (23.07%) compared to XIACY (10.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOD dropped -90.21% vs XIACY's -71.03%.

HOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOD and XIACY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer