HOOD vs. SCHG
HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 3 years, HOOD returned 98.15%/yr vs 21.96%/yr for SCHG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HOOD vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOD achieves a -12.22% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 4.93% return.
HOOD
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- 6M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- -12.22%
- 1Y
- -9.53%
- 3Y*
- 98.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.29%
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.37%
HOOD vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | -12.22% | 203.54% | 192.46% | 56.51% | -54.17% | -53.26% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 4.93% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 7.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOD and SCHG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between HOOD and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOD vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
HOOD
SCHG
HOOD vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 0.94 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 3.00 | -3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOD vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOD drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOD and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.21% | -34.59% | -55.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.26% | -16.41% | -40.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.26% | -23.39% | -33.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.88% | -3.16% | -31.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -5.19% | -55.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.07% | 5.12% | +27.95% |
Volatility
HOOD vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a higher volatility of 19.39% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.47%. This indicates that HOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOD | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.39% | 4.47% | +14.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.44% | 12.82% | +39.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.79% | 16.43% | +53.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.98% | 22.40% | +51.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.98% | 21.57% | +52.41% |
Dividends
HOOD vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
HOOD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOD and SCHG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOD has higher volatility (19.39%) compared to SCHG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOD dropped -90.21% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOD and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer