HOOD vs. FNGS
HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) is a stock, while FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Over the past 3 years, HOOD returned 113.32%/yr vs 29.80%/yr for FNGS. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HOOD vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOOD achieves a -17.60% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 6.79% return.
HOOD
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 20.81%
- YTD
- -17.60%
- 6M
- -22.02%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 113.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGS
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 29.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- —
HOOD vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | -17.60% | 203.54% | 192.46% | 56.51% | -54.17% | -53.26% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 6.79% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOOD and FNGS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between HOOD and FNGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOOD vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
HOOD
FNGS
HOOD vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOOD | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 0.75 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 2.12 | -1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOOD vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOOD drawdown since its inception was -90.21%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOD and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOOD | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.21% | -48.98% | -41.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.26% | -22.93% | -34.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.26% | -26.77% | -30.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.88% | -9.63% | -29.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.85% | -10.85% | -50.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.69% | 8.05% | +23.64% |
Volatility
HOOD vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a higher volatility of 23.07% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that HOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOOD | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.07% | 8.74% | +14.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.85% | 17.19% | +33.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.33% | 21.65% | +47.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.06% | 30.10% | +43.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.06% | 31.17% | +42.89% |
Dividends
HOOD vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOOD nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HOOD and FNGS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOD has higher volatility (23.07%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOD dropped -90.21% vs FNGS's -48.98%.
FNGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOOD and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer