HOLA vs. EFAV
HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while EFAV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. HOLA is actively managed, while EFAV is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.
Performance
HOLA vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HOLA having a 3.91% return and EFAV slightly lower at 3.83%.
HOLA
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.93%
HOLA vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 3.91% | 7.55% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.83% | 4.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOLA and EFAV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.67 |
HOLA vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOLA
EFAV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
HOLA
EFAV
Industrials
HOLA
EFAV
Technology
HOLA
EFAV
Healthcare
HOLA
EFAV
Consumer Defensive
HOLA
EFAV
Consumer Cyclical
HOLA
EFAV
Basic Materials
HOLA
EFAV
Communication Services
HOLA
EFAV
Utilities
HOLA
EFAV
Energy
HOLA
EFAV
Real Estate
HOLA
EFAV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOLA vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank
HOLA
EFAV
HOLA vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOLA | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.53 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
HOLA vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and EFAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOLA | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -27.56% | +20.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -5.61% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -4.77% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.30% | — |
Volatility
HOLA vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOLA | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 10.35% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 11.79% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 13.21% | -3.71% |
HOLA vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOLA vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison
HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.08% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.91% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOLA and EFAV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.
EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.91% for HOLA.
HOLA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while EFAV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.20% for EFAV.
Find the right allocation for HOLA and EFAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer