HOEGF vs. MT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and ArcelorMittal (MT).

Performance

HOEGF vs. MT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and ArcelorMittal (MT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HOEGF vs. MT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HOEGF Höegh Autoliners ASA	47.15%	21.46%	63.48%	152.27%	99.45%	-3.23%
MT ArcelorMittal	14.33%	100.13%	-16.92%	10.28%	-16.44%	18.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HOEGF : $2.70B MT : $39.71B
EPS HOEGF : $2.70 MT : $4.11
PE Ratio HOEGF : 5.26 MT : 12.64
PEG Ratio HOEGF : 0.13 MT : 0.78
PS Ratio HOEGF : 1.90 MT : 0.65
PB Ratio HOEGF : 2.12 MT : 0.73
Total Revenue (TTM) HOEGF : $1.43B MT : $61.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) HOEGF : $515.94M MT : $33.49B
EBITDA (TTM) HOEGF : $691.26M MT : $5.91B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOEGF achieves a 47.15% return, which is significantly higher than MT's 14.33% return.

HOEGF

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 47.15%
• 6M: 30.97%
• 1Y: 110.51%
• 3Y*: 76.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MT

• 1D: 7.20%
• 1M: -20.23%
• YTD: 14.33%
• 6M: 45.11%
• 1Y: 83.45%
• 3Y*: 22.20%
• 5Y*: 13.90%
• 10Y*: 14.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HOEGF vs. MT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOEGF

HOEGF Risk / Return Rank: 90
HOEGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HOEGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
HOEGF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HOEGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HOEGF Martin Ratio Rank: 86

MT

MT Risk / Return Rank: 89
MT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOEGF vs. MT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and ArcelorMittal (MT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HOEGF	MT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.03	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.68	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.35	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	2.91	+0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.41	11.43	-3.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HOEGF vs. MT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOEGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the MT Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOEGF and MT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOEGF	MT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.03	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	0.02	+1.67

Correlation

The correlation between HOEGF and MT is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HOEGF vs. MT - Dividend Comparison

HOEGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than MT's 1.35% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HOEGF Höegh Autoliners ASA	5.83%	18.43%	44.08%	13.80%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MT ArcelorMittal	1.35%	1.21%	2.16%	1.55%	1.45%	0.94%	0.00%	1.14%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	4.03%

Drawdowns

HOEGF vs. MT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOEGF drawdown since its inception was -41.98%, smaller than the maximum MT drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOEGF and MT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOEGF	MT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.98%	-97.34%	+55.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.63%	-28.84%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.99%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-69.76%	+68.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-69.44%	+61.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.14%	7.34%	+5.80%

Volatility

HOEGF vs. MT - Volatility Comparison

Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and ArcelorMittal (MT) have volatilities of 17.94% and 18.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOEGF	MT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.94%	18.36%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.77%	30.41%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.90%	41.35%	+5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.48%	39.08%	+11.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.48%	45.00%	+5.48%

Financials

HOEGF vs. MT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Höegh Autoliners ASA and ArcelorMittal over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HOEGF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported a gross profit of 120.94M and revenue of 358.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

MT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 14.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.3%.

HOEGF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported an operating income of 114.60M and revenue of 358.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.

MT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ArcelorMittal reported an operating income of 327.00M and revenue of 14.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

HOEGF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported a net income of 104.59M and revenue of 358.52M, resulting in a net margin of 29.2%.

MT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a net income of 177.00M and revenue of 14.97B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.