MT vs. PANW
Compare and contrast key facts about ArcelorMittal (MT) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MT or PANW.
Correlation
The correlation between MT and PANW is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MT vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MT:
0.57
PANW:
0.74
MT:
1.23
PANW:
1.30
MT:
1.15
PANW:
1.16
MT:
0.29
PANW:
1.06
MT:
2.18
PANW:
3.18
MT:
11.61%
PANW:
8.90%
MT:
40.84%
PANW:
36.31%
MT:
-97.23%
PANW:
-47.98%
MT:
-81.97%
PANW:
-8.34%
Fundamentals
MT:
$23.95B
PANW:
$127.12B
MT:
$1.57
PANW:
$1.76
MT:
20.03
PANW:
109.09
MT:
0.66
PANW:
2.37
MT:
0.39
PANW:
14.83
MT:
0.47
PANW:
20.10
MT:
$60.96B
PANW:
$6.59B
MT:
$34.83B
PANW:
$4.86B
MT:
$6.03B
PANW:
$1.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MT achieves a 35.62% return, which is significantly higher than PANW's 4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MT has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 1.79%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.22% annualized return.
MT
35.62%
17.36%
31.97%
23.10%
31.55%
1.79%
PANW
4.91%
12.31%
-5.11%
26.62%
38.92%
22.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MT vs. PANW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MT
PANW
MT vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MT vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
MT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT ArcelorMittal | 1.59% | 2.16% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 1.14% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.55% | 1.74% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MT vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MT drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MT and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
MT vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ArcelorMittal (MT) is 8.41%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that MT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
MT vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcelorMittal and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MT vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison
MT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported a gross profit of 14.80B and revenue of 14.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
PANW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.
MT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported an operating income of 825.00M and revenue of 14.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.
PANW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 240.40M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
MT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported a net income of 805.00M and revenue of 14.80B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
PANW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 267.30M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.