MT vs. PANW
MT (ArcelorMittal) and PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. MT operates in Steel (Basic Materials), while PANW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MT returned 15.47%/yr vs 31.54%/yr for PANW. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MT vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MT achieves a 54.65% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 80.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MT has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of 15.47%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 31.54% annualized return.
MT
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 30.58%
- YTD
- 54.65%
- 1Y
- 129.25%
- 3Y*
- 37.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.93%
PANW
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 87.51%
- YTD
- 80.15%
- 1Y
- 91.94%
- 3Y*
- 37.88%
- 5Y*
- 37.91%
- 10Y*
- 31.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 29.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $109.13M | $116.87M | $127.49M | |
| $1.96B | $2.24B | $2.30B |
MT vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT ArcelorMittal | 54.65% | 100.13% | -16.92% | 10.28% | -16.44% | 40.29% | 30.56% | -14.14% | -35.85% | 47.53% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 80.15% | 1.23% | 23.41% | 111.32% | -24.81% | 56.66% | 53.68% | 22.78% | 29.95% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MT and PANW is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012 | 0.20 |
The correlation between MT and PANW shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MT:
$53.38B
PANW:
$270.44B
MT:
$3.82
PANW:
$1.17
MT:
18.34
PANW:
284.27
MT:
1.13
PANW:
0.02
MT:
0.86
PANW:
22.59
MT:
0.97
PANW:
8.92
MT:
$62.01B
PANW:
$10.61B
MT:
$34.15B
PANW:
$7.63B
MT:
$5.81B
PANW:
$1.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MT vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank
MT
PANW
MT vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MT | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.36 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 2.55 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 5.95 | +8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MT vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MT drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MT and PANW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MT | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.34% | -47.98% | -49.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.84% | -36.01% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.83% | -36.01% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.99% | -36.01% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.10% | -47.98% | -33.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.10% | -7.49% | -51.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.36% | -14.59% | -54.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.82% | 15.38% | -6.56% |
Volatility
MT vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ArcelorMittal (MT) is 11.90%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 14.66%. This indicates that MT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MT | PANW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 14.66% | -2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.25% | 35.66% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.18% | 41.04% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.86% | 42.40% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.45% | 38.91% | +5.54% |
Dividends
MT vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
MT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT ArcelorMittal | 0.82% | 1.21% | 2.16% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 1.14% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MT vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcelorMittal and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MT vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison
MT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a gross profit of 15.46B and revenue of 15.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
PANW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
MT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ArcelorMittal reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 15.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
PANW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.
MT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a net income of 575.00M and revenue of 15.46B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
PANW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MT and PANW have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PANW has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to MT (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MT dropped -97.34% vs PANW's -47.98%.
MT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MT and PANW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer