MT vs. PANW
Compare and contrast key facts about ArcelorMittal (MT) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MT or PANW.
Correlation
The correlation between MT and PANW is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MT vs. PANW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MT:
-0.57
PANW:
0.55
MT:
-0.65
PANW:
0.91
MT:
0.92
PANW:
1.16
MT:
-0.19
PANW:
0.79
MT:
-1.19
PANW:
1.66
MT:
13.90%
PANW:
14.50%
MT:
28.69%
PANW:
43.51%
MT:
-97.20%
PANW:
-47.98%
MT:
-86.33%
PANW:
-7.97%
Fundamentals
MT:
$19.30B
PANW:
$132.05B
MT:
-$1.32
PANW:
$3.85
MT:
0.66
PANW:
1.46
MT:
$80.26B
PANW:
$8.29B
MT:
$23.66B
PANW:
$6.15B
MT:
$7.98B
PANW:
$1.40B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MT achieves a -16.76% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 26.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MT has underperformed PANW with an annualized return of -0.39%, while PANW has yielded a comparatively higher 24.56% annualized return.
MT
-16.76%
-7.58%
-1.04%
-17.54%
6.68%
-0.39%
PANW
26.68%
-4.92%
16.62%
24.77%
37.33%
24.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MT vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MT vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison
MT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ArcelorMittal | 2.16% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 1.14% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.97% | 2.28% | 1.41% |
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MT vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MT drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MT and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MT vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ArcelorMittal (MT) is 8.56%, while Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a volatility of 11.24%. This indicates that MT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MT vs. PANW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcelorMittal and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities