MT vs. PKX
MT (ArcelorMittal) and PKX (POSCO Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Steel industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, MT returned 17.84%/yr vs 5.58%/yr for PKX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MT vs. PKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MT achieves a 40.56% return, which is significantly higher than PKX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MT has outperformed PKX with an annualized return of 17.84%, while PKX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.58% annualized return.
MT
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 40.56%
- 6M
- 42.09%
- 1Y
- 115.18%
- 3Y*
- 35.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.84%
PKX
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -22.38%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- -5.71%
- 5Y*
- -2.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.58%
MT vs. PKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT ArcelorMittal | 40.56% | 100.13% | -16.92% | 10.28% | -16.44% | 40.29% | 30.56% | -14.14% | -35.85% | 47.53% |
PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | 8.70% | 27.24% | -52.98% | 77.86% | -3.49% | -3.40% | 25.14% | -7.86% | -29.68% | 51.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between MT and PKX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 1997 | 0.44 |
The correlation between MT and PKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MT:
$48.71B
PKX:
$21.51B
MT:
$3.82
PKX:
₩697.72
MT:
16.71
PKX:
127.02
MT:
0.79
PKX:
0.96
MT:
0.88
PKX:
0.59
MT:
$62.01B
PKX:
₩51.56T
MT:
$34.15B
PKX:
₩3.80T
MT:
$5.81B
PKX:
₩4.70T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MT vs. PKX — Risk / Return Rank
MT
PKX
MT vs. PKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MT | PKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.13 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 0.65 | +3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.85 | 1.73 | +12.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MT vs. PKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MT drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than PKX's maximum drawdown of -82.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MT and PKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MT | PKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.34% | -82.11% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.84% | -36.94% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.83% | -68.71% | +37.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.99% | -68.71% | +22.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.10% | -71.23% | -9.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.82% | -54.23% | -8.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.39% | -44.23% | -25.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | 13.94% | -5.59% |
Volatility
MT vs. PKX - Volatility Comparison
ArcelorMittal (MT) and POSCO Holdings Inc. (PKX) have volatilities of 14.41% and 13.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MT | PKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.41% | 13.81% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.14% | 34.16% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.49% | 43.10% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.91% | 40.01% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.91% | 37.74% | +7.17% |
Dividends
MT vs. PKX - Dividend Comparison
MT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than PKX's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MT ArcelorMittal | 0.90% | 1.21% | 2.16% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 1.14% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% |
PKX POSCO Holdings Inc. | 1.51% | 3.32% | 5.32% | 1.50% | 2.74% | 3.54% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 3.32% | 4.85% |
Financials
MT vs. PKX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcelorMittal and POSCO Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MT vs. PKX - Profitability Comparison
MT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a gross profit of 15.46B and revenue of 15.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
PKX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 12.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.5%.
MT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ArcelorMittal reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 15.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
PKX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 496.57M and revenue of 12.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
MT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ArcelorMittal reported a net income of 575.00M and revenue of 15.46B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
PKX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, POSCO Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 318.82M and revenue of 12.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MT and PKX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MT has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to PKX (13.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MT dropped -97.34% vs PKX's -82.11%.
MT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MT and PKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer