HOEGF vs. MPC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HOEGF (Höegh Autoliners ASA) and MPC (Marathon Petroleum Corporation) are both stocks. HOEGF operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while MPC operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy). Over the past 3 years, HOEGF returned 73.30%/yr vs 37.67%/yr for MPC. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HOEGF vs. MPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOEGF achieves a 51.81% return, which is significantly lower than MPC's 65.76% return.

HOEGF

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 51.81%
• 6M: 64.24%
• 1Y: 68.62%
• 3Y*: 73.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MPC

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: 6.21%
• YTD: 65.76%
• 6M: 42.31%
• 1Y: 68.20%
• 3Y*: 37.67%
• 5Y*: 36.42%
• 10Y*: 26.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOEGF vs. MPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HOEGF Höegh Autoliners ASA	51.81%	21.46%	63.48%	152.27%	99.45%	-3.23%
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation	65.76%	19.17%	-4.06%	30.46%	86.62%	5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HOEGF and MPC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2021	0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap HOEGF : $2.80B MPC : $78.83B
EPS HOEGF : $2.43 MPC : $15.35
PE Ratio HOEGF : 6.03 MPC : 17.41
PEG Ratio HOEGF : 0.15 MPC : 0.08
PS Ratio HOEGF : 1.91 MPC : 0.59
PB Ratio HOEGF : 2.18 MPC : 4.71
Total Revenue (TTM) HOEGF : $1.46B MPC : $135.75B
Gross Profit (TTM) HOEGF : $510.98M MPC : $11.95B
EBITDA (TTM) HOEGF : $637.13M MPC : $12.39B

Return for Risk

HOEGF vs. MPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOEGF

HOEGF Risk / Return Rank: 79
HOEGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
HOEGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
HOEGF Omega Ratio Rank: 81
HOEGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
HOEGF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

MPC

MPC Risk / Return Rank: 86
MPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MPC Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MPC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOEGF vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HOEGF	MPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.18	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.73	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.36	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.74	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	9.89	-4.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HOEGF vs. MPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOEGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the MPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOEGF and MPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOEGF	MPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	2.18	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	0.56	+1.08

Drawdowns

HOEGF vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOEGF drawdown since its inception was -41.98%, smaller than the maximum MPC drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOEGF and MPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOEGF	MPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.98%	-79.67%	+37.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.63%	-18.33%	-12.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.98%	-44.75%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-79.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.85%	0.00%	-11.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.13%	-17.36%	+9.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.14%	6.93%	+6.21%

Volatility

HOEGF vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison

Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) has a higher volatility of 13.45% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 11.31%. This indicates that HOEGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOEGF	MPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.45%	11.31%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.43%	25.81%	+3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.96%	31.50%	+11.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.11%	33.04%	+17.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.11%	40.26%	+9.85%

Dividends

HOEGF vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison

HOEGF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HOEGF Höegh Autoliners ASA	0.00%	18.43%	44.08%	13.80%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation	1.46%	2.29%	2.43%	2.07%	2.14%	3.63%	5.61%	3.52%	3.12%	2.30%	2.70%	2.20%

Financials

HOEGF vs. MPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Höegh Autoliners ASA and Marathon Petroleum Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HOEGF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported a gross profit of 121.06M and revenue of 361.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.5%.

MPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.31B and revenue of 34.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

HOEGF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported an operating income of 113.92M and revenue of 361.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.5%.

MPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 34.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

HOEGF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported a net income of 103.02M and revenue of 361.29M, resulting in a net margin of 28.5%.

MPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of 511.00M and revenue of 34.57B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOEGF and MPC in my portfolio?

HOEGF and MPC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOEGF or MPC?

HOEGF has higher volatility (13.45%) compared to MPC (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOEGF dropped -41.98% vs MPC's -79.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.