PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MT vs. STLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MTSTLD
YTD Return-12.05%17.92%
1Y Return6.56%25.61%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.44%30.28%
5Y Return (Ann)9.28%37.03%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.81%22.53%
Sharpe Ratio0.280.82
Sortino Ratio0.581.47
Omega Ratio1.071.17
Calmar Ratio0.090.96
Martin Ratio0.602.18
Ulcer Index13.47%12.02%
Daily Std Dev28.53%31.76%
Max Drawdown-97.20%-87.05%
Current Drawdown-85.56%-10.70%

Fundamentals


MTSTLD
Market Cap$19.80B$22.50B
EPS-$1.32$10.86
PEG Ratio0.6610.91
Total Revenue (TTM)$81.34B$17.90B
Gross Profit (TTM)$8.46B$3.08B
EBITDA (TTM)$8.67B$2.36B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MT and STLD is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MT vs. STLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MT achieves a -12.05% return, which is significantly lower than STLD's 17.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MT has underperformed STLD with an annualized return of -0.81%, while STLD has yielded a comparatively higher 22.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.33%
2.87%
MT
STLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MT vs. STLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MT, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MT, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MT, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MT, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MT, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.60
STLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for STLD, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for STLD, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for STLD, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for STLD, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.96
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for STLD, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.18

MT vs. STLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MT Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the STLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MT and STLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.28
0.82
MT
STLD

Dividends

MT vs. STLD - Dividend Comparison

MT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than STLD's 1.31% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MT
ArcelorMittal
2.04%1.55%1.45%0.94%0.00%1.14%0.48%0.00%0.00%5.97%2.28%1.41%
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
1.31%1.44%1.39%1.68%2.71%2.82%2.50%1.44%1.57%3.09%2.33%2.25%

Drawdowns

MT vs. STLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MT drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than STLD's maximum drawdown of -87.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MT and STLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-85.56%
-10.70%
MT
STLD

Volatility

MT vs. STLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ArcelorMittal (MT) is 9.69%, while Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) has a volatility of 16.75%. This indicates that MT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.69%
16.75%
MT
STLD

Financials

MT vs. STLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcelorMittal and Steel Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items