PortfoliosLab logo
MT vs. STLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MT and STLD is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MT vs. STLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ArcelorMittal (MT) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MT:

0.52

STLD:

-0.05

Sortino Ratio

MT:

1.06

STLD:

0.28

Omega Ratio

MT:

1.13

STLD:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

MT:

0.23

STLD:

-0.00

Martin Ratio

MT:

1.75

STLD:

-0.01

Ulcer Index

MT:

11.59%

STLD:

14.18%

Daily Std Dev

MT:

40.74%

STLD:

37.46%

Max Drawdown

MT:

-97.23%

STLD:

-87.05%

Current Drawdown

MT:

-82.61%

STLD:

-14.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MT:

$23.05B

STLD:

$19.56B

EPS

MT:

$1.57

STLD:

$7.61

PE Ratio

MT:

19.28

STLD:

17.15

PEG Ratio

MT:

0.66

STLD:

10.91

PS Ratio

MT:

0.38

STLD:

1.14

PB Ratio

MT:

0.44

STLD:

2.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

MT:

$60.96B

STLD:

$17.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MT:

$34.83B

STLD:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

MT:

$6.03B

STLD:

$1.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MT achieves a 30.87% return, which is significantly higher than STLD's 14.88% return. Over the past 10 years, MT has underperformed STLD with an annualized return of 2.27%, while STLD has yielded a comparatively higher 22.31% annualized return.


MT

YTD

30.87%

1M

18.80%

6M

17.14%

1Y

20.93%

5Y*

28.64%

10Y*

2.27%

STLD

YTD

14.88%

1M

11.08%

6M

-11.43%

1Y

-1.95%

5Y*

42.79%

10Y*

22.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MT vs. STLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MT is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MT is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MT is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MT is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MT is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MT is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

STLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STLD is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STLD is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STLD is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STLD is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STLD is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STLD is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MT vs. STLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MT Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the STLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MT and STLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MT vs. STLD - Dividend Comparison

MT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than STLD's 1.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MT
ArcelorMittal
1.65%2.16%1.55%1.45%0.94%0.00%1.14%0.48%0.00%0.00%4.55%1.74%
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
1.44%1.61%1.44%1.39%1.68%2.71%2.82%2.50%1.44%1.57%3.09%2.33%

Drawdowns

MT vs. STLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MT drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than STLD's maximum drawdown of -87.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MT and STLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MT vs. STLD - Volatility Comparison

ArcelorMittal (MT) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) at 10.59%. This indicates that MT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MT vs. STLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ArcelorMittal and Steel Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20212022202320242025
14.80B
4.37B
(MT) Total Revenue
(STLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MT vs. STLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ArcelorMittal and Steel Dynamics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
11.1%
(MT) Gross Margin
(STLD) Gross Margin
MT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported a gross profit of 14.80B and revenue of 14.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

STLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.54M and revenue of 4.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.1%.

MT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported an operating income of 825.00M and revenue of 14.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

STLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 275.14M and revenue of 4.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

MT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ArcelorMittal reported a net income of 805.00M and revenue of 14.80B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

STLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 217.15M and revenue of 4.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.