HOEGF vs. MPLX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and MPLX LP (MPLX).

Performance

HOEGF vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and MPLX LP (MPLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HOEGF vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HOEGF Höegh Autoliners ASA	47.15%	21.46%	63.48%	152.27%	99.45%	-3.23%
MPLX MPLX LP	9.03%	20.54%	41.72%	22.46%	21.09%	2.96%

Fundamentals

EPS HOEGF : $2.70 MPLX : $7.24
PE Ratio HOEGF : 5.26 MPLX : 7.88
PEG Ratio HOEGF : 0.13 MPLX : 0.14
PS Ratio HOEGF : 1.90 MPLX : 2.98
Total Revenue (TTM) HOEGF : $1.43B MPLX : $13.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) HOEGF : $515.94M MPLX : $4.69B
EBITDA (TTM) HOEGF : $691.26M MPLX : $6.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOEGF achieves a 47.15% return, which is significantly higher than MPLX's 9.03% return.

HOEGF

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 47.15%
• 6M: 30.97%
• 1Y: 110.51%
• 3Y*: 76.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MPLX

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 15.36%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 27.90%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HOEGF vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOEGF

HOEGF Risk / Return Rank: 90
HOEGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HOEGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
HOEGF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HOEGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HOEGF Martin Ratio Rank: 86

MPLX

MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOEGF vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HOEGF	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	0.82	+1.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	1.19	+1.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.16	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	1.07	+2.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.41	3.80	+4.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HOEGF vs. MPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOEGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the MPLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOEGF and MPLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOEGF	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	0.82	+1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	0.39	+1.30

Correlation

The correlation between HOEGF and MPLX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HOEGF vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison

HOEGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than MPLX's 7.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HOEGF Höegh Autoliners ASA	5.83%	18.43%	44.08%	13.80%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MPLX MPLX LP	7.12%	7.39%	7.33%	8.65%	8.80%	11.30%	12.70%	10.41%	8.22%	6.23%	5.86%	4.33%

Drawdowns

HOEGF vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOEGF drawdown since its inception was -41.98%, smaller than the maximum MPLX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOEGF and MPLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOEGF	MPLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.98%	-85.72%	+43.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.63%	-13.38%	-17.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-3.55%	+2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-30.33%	+22.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.14%	3.75%	+9.39%

Volatility

HOEGF vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison

Höegh Autoliners ASA (HOEGF) has a higher volatility of 17.94% compared to MPLX LP (MPLX) at 3.97%. This indicates that HOEGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOEGF	MPLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.94%	3.97%	+13.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.77%	11.15%	+18.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.90%	18.89%	+28.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.48%	19.54%	+30.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.48%	30.91%	+19.57%

Financials

HOEGF vs. MPLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Höegh Autoliners ASA and MPLX LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HOEGF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported a gross profit of 120.94M and revenue of 358.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

MPLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HOEGF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported an operating income of 114.60M and revenue of 358.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.

MPLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.

HOEGF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Höegh Autoliners ASA reported a net income of 104.59M and revenue of 358.52M, resulting in a net margin of 29.2%.

MPLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.