HODL vs. ETHV
HODL (VanEck Bitcoin Trust) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from VanEck - HODL tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while ETHV tracks the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HODL returned -38.56% vs -31.70% for ETHV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HODL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.
Performance
HODL vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HODL achieves a -25.27% return, which is significantly higher than ETHV's -39.43% return.
HODL
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -18.34%
- YTD
- -25.27%
- 6M
- -29.73%
- 1Y
- -38.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV
- 1D
- -5.70%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.69%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HODL vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HODL VanEck Bitcoin Trust | -25.27% | -6.42% | 42.47% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -11.02% | -3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HODL and ETHV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between HODL and ETHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HODL vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank
HODL
ETHV
HODL vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HODL | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.97 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.51 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -0.84 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HODL | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | -0.47 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -0.41 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
HODL vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HODL drawdown since its inception was -49.25%, smaller than the maximum ETHV drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HODL and ETHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HODL | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.25% | -64.02% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.25% | -62.87% | +13.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.93% | -62.87% | +14.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -32.64% | +16.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.35% | 37.74% | -9.39% |
Volatility
HODL vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) have volatilities of 9.43% and 9.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HODL | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.43% | 9.92% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.37% | 46.03% | -11.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.51% | 68.43% | -24.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.88% | 72.30% | -22.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.88% | 72.30% | -22.42% |
HODL vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HODL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HODL vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison
Neither HODL nor ETHV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HODL and ETHV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHV has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to HODL (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HODL dropped -49.25% vs ETHV's -64.02%.
On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -31.70% vs -38.56% for HODL. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HODL has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -31.70% return vs -38.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HODL.
HODL and ETHV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HODL and 0.20% for ETHV.
ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HODL and ETHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer