ETHV vs. ETHA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA).

ETHV and ETHA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHV is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. It was launched on Jun 25, 2024. ETHA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate-New York Variant. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. Both ETHV and ETHA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ETHV vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHV vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF	-27.92%	-11.02%	-3.67%
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	-27.95%	-11.31%	-3.62%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETHV having a -27.92% return and ETHA slightly lower at -27.95%.

ETHV

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 5.07%
• YTD: -27.92%
• 6M: -50.71%
• 1Y: 11.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHA

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: -27.95%
• 6M: -50.73%
• 1Y: 11.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHV vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ETHA

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF

ETHV

VanEck Ethereum ETF

Return for Risk

ETHV vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHV

ETHV Risk / Return Rank: 19
ETHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ETHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ETHV Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ETHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ETHV Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ETHA

ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 19
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHV vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHV	ETHA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.15	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	0.79	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.09	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.28	0.27	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	0.55	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHV vs. ETHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHV Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is comparable to the ETHA Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHV and ETHA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHV	ETHA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	0.15	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	-0.33	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between ETHV and ETHA is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ETHV vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHV nor ETHA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ETHV vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHA drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and ETHA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHV	ETHA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.02%	-64.02%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.66%	-61.66%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.81%	-55.83%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.45%	-30.46%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.61%	30.61%	0.00%

Volatility

ETHV vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) have volatilities of 19.09% and 19.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHV	ETHA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.09%	19.12%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.57%	53.75%	-0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.78%	76.10%	-0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.81%	75.03%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.81%	75.03%	-0.22%