ETHV vs. ETHA
ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) and ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ETHV tracks the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate while ETHA tracks the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHV returned -28.51% vs -28.54% for ETHA. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETHV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ETHA.
Performance
ETHV vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with ETHV at -44.18% and ETHA at -44.18%.
ETHV
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -19.65%
- YTD
- -44.18%
- 6M
- -44.14%
- 1Y
- -28.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHA
- 1D
- -4.13%
- 1M
- -19.59%
- YTD
- -44.18%
- 6M
- -44.16%
- 1Y
- -28.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -44.18% | -11.02% | -5.50% |
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | -44.18% | -11.31% | -4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHV and ETHA is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ETHV and ETHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHV vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank
ETHV
ETHA
ETHV vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETHV | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | -0.71 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETHV vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHV drawdown since its inception was -67.54%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHA drawdown of -67.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHV and ETHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHV | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.54% | -67.56% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.54% | -67.56% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.78% | -65.78% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -33.64% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.40% | 40.40% | 0.00% |
Volatility
ETHV vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) have volatilities of 19.72% and 19.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHV | ETHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.72% | 19.90% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.91% | 47.13% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.06% | 69.33% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.41% | 72.65% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.41% | 72.65% | -0.24% |
ETHV vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHV vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHV nor ETHA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ETHV and ETHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ETHA has higher volatility (19.90%) compared to ETHV (19.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHV dropped -67.54% vs ETHA's -67.56%.
On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -28.51% vs -28.54% for ETHA. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 19.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -28.51% return vs -28.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHA.
ETHV and ETHA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate, while ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHV and 0.25% for ETHA.
ETHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHV and ETHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer