HNASX vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HNASX (Homestead Growth Fund) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both funds - HNASX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Homestead, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, HNASX returned 11.70%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HNASX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

HNASX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNASX achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.

HNASX

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: 4.93%
• 1Y: 19.49%
• 3Y*: 23.30%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: 17.24%

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNASX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund	5.14%	16.97%	30.93%	47.78%	-33.56%	16.94%	5.99%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HNASX and QQQM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.95

The correlation between HNASX and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HNASX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNASX

HNASX Risk / Return Rank: 15
HNASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HNASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HNASX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HNASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
HNASX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNASX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HNASX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.65	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	3.46	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.45	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	3.53	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.33	13.52	-10.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HNASX vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNASX and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HNASX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.65	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.82	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.85	-0.54

Drawdowns

HNASX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNASX drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNASX and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HNASX	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.74%	-35.04%	-37.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.90%	-11.96%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.23%	-22.70%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.22%	-35.04%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-0.20%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.68%	-8.25%	-16.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.03%	3.11%	+2.92%

Volatility

HNASX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) is 3.42%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that HNASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HNASX	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	4.48%	-1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	12.05%	+0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.37%	15.91%	+0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.30%	22.24%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.80%	22.12%	-0.32%

HNASX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNASX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

HNASX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

HNASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund	14.56%	15.31%	6.29%	2.57%	6.80%	9.12%	4.73%	5.35%	10.41%	6.41%	1.54%	6.52%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HNASX and QQQM in my portfolio?

HNASX and QQQM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HNASX or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to HNASX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNASX dropped -72.74% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.