HNASX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
HNASX is managed by Homestead. It was launched on Jan 22, 2001. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
HNASX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HNASX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund | -11.99% | 16.97% | 30.93% | 47.78% | -33.56% | 16.94% | 38.72% | 28.39% | 2.84% | 36.54% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HNASX achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HNASX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.45%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
HNASX
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -11.99%
- 6M
- -11.07%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.45%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HNASX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HNASX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HNASX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
HNASX
SCHG
HNASX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HNASX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.76 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.24 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.17 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 1.09 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | 3.71 | -1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HNASX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.76 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.57 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.79 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.79 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between HNASX and SCHG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HNASX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
HNASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.39%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund | 17.39% | 15.31% | 6.29% | 2.57% | 6.80% | 9.12% | 4.73% | 5.35% | 10.41% | 6.41% | 1.54% | 6.52% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
HNASX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HNASX drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNASX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HNASX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.74% | -34.59% | -38.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.90% | -16.41% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.22% | -34.59% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.22% | -34.59% | -2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.62% | -12.51% | -3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.81% | -5.22% | -19.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 4.84% | +0.84% |
Volatility
HNASX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that HNASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HNASX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 6.77% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 12.54% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 22.45% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 22.31% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 21.51% | +0.26% |