PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNASX vs. FELG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HNASX vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNASX achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than FELG's 7.70% return.


HNASX

1D
-1.01%
1M
5.19%
YTD
5.14%
6M
4.93%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
23.30%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
17.24%

FELG

1D
-1.12%
1M
5.85%
YTD
7.70%
6M
7.23%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNASX vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HNASX
Homestead Growth Fund
5.14%16.97%30.93%4.20%
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
7.70%18.44%35.45%4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HNASX and FELG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023

0.96

The correlation between HNASX and FELG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HNASX vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNASX
HNASX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HNASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HNASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNASX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FELG
FELG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNASX vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HNASXFELGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.71

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

5.86

-2.53

HNASX vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNASX and FELG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HNASXFELGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.79

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.32

-1.01

Drawdowns

HNASX vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNASX drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than FELG's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNASX and FELG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNASXFELGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.74%

-23.89%

-48.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.90%

-16.17%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-1.34%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.68%

-3.52%

-21.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

4.72%

+1.31%

Volatility

HNASX vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNASXFELGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

3.50%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

11.59%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

15.46%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

19.89%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

19.89%

+1.91%

HNASX vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNASX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

HNASX vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

HNASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, more than FELG's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
0.34%0.38%0.44%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HNASX
Homestead Growth Fund
14.56%15.31%6.29%2.57%6.80%9.12%4.73%5.35%10.41%6.41%1.54%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, HNASX and FELG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FELG has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to HNASX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNASX dropped -72.74% vs FELG's -23.89%.

FELG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNASX and FELG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer