HNASX vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).
HNASX is managed by Homestead. It was launched on Jan 22, 2001. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005.
Performance
HNASX vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HNASX vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund | -11.99% | 16.97% | 30.93% | 47.78% | -33.56% | 16.94% | 38.72% | 28.39% | 2.84% | 36.54% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | -7.18% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HNASX achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's -7.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HNASX having a 15.45% annualized return and XLG not far ahead at 15.72%.
HNASX
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -11.99%
- 6M
- -11.07%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.45%
XLG
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- -7.18%
- 6M
- -4.55%
- 1Y
- 19.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HNASX vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HNASX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HNASX vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
HNASX
XLG
HNASX vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HNASX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.99 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.54 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.22 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 1.63 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | 5.71 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HNASX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.99 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.75 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.84 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.59 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between HNASX and XLG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HNASX vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
HNASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.39%, more than XLG's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund | 17.39% | 15.31% | 6.29% | 2.57% | 6.80% | 9.12% | 4.73% | 5.35% | 10.41% | 6.41% | 1.54% | 6.52% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Drawdowns
HNASX vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HNASX drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNASX and XLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HNASX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.74% | -52.39% | -20.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.90% | -12.41% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.22% | -28.02% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.22% | -30.46% | -6.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.62% | -8.93% | -6.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.81% | -7.69% | -17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 3.54% | +2.14% |
Volatility
HNASX vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.82%. This indicates that HNASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HNASX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 5.82% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 10.65% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 19.97% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 18.68% | +3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 18.81% | +2.96% |