HLT vs. MUSA
HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) and MUSA (Murphy USA Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — HLT in Lodging, MUSA in Specialty Retail. Over the past 10 years, HLT returned 48.07%/yr vs 23.79%/yr for MUSA. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLT vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's 45.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 48.07%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively lower 23.79% annualized return.
HLT
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 21.54%
- 1Y
- 42.62%
- 3Y*
- 35.44%
- 5Y*
- 22.62%
- 10Y*
- 48.07%
MUSA
- 1D
- -5.73%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 45.83%
- 6M
- 45.23%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- 35.08%
- 10Y*
- 23.79%
HLT vs. MUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 20.95% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 45.83% | -19.15% | 41.27% | 28.20% | 41.02% | 53.33% | 12.06% | 52.66% | -4.63% | 30.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLT and MUSA is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.23 |
The correlation between HLT and MUSA shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HLT:
$80.53B
MUSA:
$10.98B
HLT:
$6.50
MUSA:
$28.85
HLT:
53.41
MUSA:
20.34
HLT:
0.86
MUSA:
1.10
HLT:
6.71
MUSA:
0.57
HLT:
$12.28B
MUSA:
$19.68B
HLT:
$5.44B
MUSA:
$487.10M
HLT:
$3.00B
MUSA:
$1.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLT vs. MUSA — Risk / Return Rank
HLT
MUSA
HLT vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HLT | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 2.38 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 4.89 | +4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HLT vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and MUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLT | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.82% | -35.54% | -15.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -19.72% | +9.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -35.54% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -35.54% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.82% | -35.54% | -15.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.73% | +5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -9.97% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 9.58% | -5.17% |
Volatility
HLT vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) is 6.73%, while Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) has a volatility of 13.88%. This indicates that HLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLT | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 13.88% | -7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 30.78% | -13.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.99% | 39.53% | -16.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 30.54% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 181.03% | 31.39% | +149.64% |
Dividends
HLT vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than MUSA's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.41% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HLT vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HLT vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
MUSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
MUSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 205.20M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
MUSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 136.30M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HLT and MUSA have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUSA has higher volatility (13.88%) compared to HLT (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLT dropped -50.82% vs MUSA's -35.54%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLT and MUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer