PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLFNX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLFNX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLFNX achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 12.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFNX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 11.63%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.10% annualized return.


HLFNX

1D
-0.42%
1M
5.73%
YTD
-0.54%
6M
-2.56%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
22.88%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
11.63%

FASGX

1D
1.23%
1M
2.18%
YTD
12.03%
6M
12.13%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLFNX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLFNX
Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund
-0.54%22.07%28.45%4.58%-24.88%18.96%16.55%29.75%-11.78%19.42%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
12.03%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HLFNX and FASGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.77

The correlation between HLFNX and FASGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLFNX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLFNX
HLFNX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HLFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLFNX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLFNXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.44

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

3.27

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

14.11

-12.34

HLFNX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLFNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLFNX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLFNX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLFNX drawdown since its inception was -71.74%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFNX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLFNXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.74%

-47.35%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.44%

-7.95%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.02%

-12.80%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.03%

-23.54%

-20.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.03%

-27.20%

-16.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

0.00%

-4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-6.71%

-14.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

1.84%

+5.69%

Volatility

HLFNX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.68%. This indicates that HLFNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLFNXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

4.68%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

9.32%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.84%

11.08%

+8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

12.40%

+11.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.21%

12.71%

+11.50%

HLFNX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLFNX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLFNX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

HLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
HLFNX
Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund
7.96%7.92%0.56%1.72%7.39%5.16%0.00%0.00%3.15%4.60%0.54%10.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLFNX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLFNX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to FASGX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLFNX dropped -71.74% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLFNX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer