HLFNX vs. RMBKX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HLFNX (Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund) and RMBKX (RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund) are both Financials Equities funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, HLFNX returned 11.63%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for RMBKX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HLFNX charges 1.68%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for RMBKX.

Performance

HLFNX vs. RMBKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLFNX achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than RMBKX's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFNX has outperformed RMBKX with an annualized return of 11.63%, while RMBKX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.

HLFNX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 5.73%
• YTD: -0.54%
• 6M: -2.56%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: 22.88%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 11.63%

RMBKX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 38.99%
• 3Y*: 21.84%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLFNX vs. RMBKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HLFNX Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund	-0.54%	22.07%	28.45%	4.58%	-24.88%	18.96%	16.55%	29.75%	-11.78%	19.42%
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund	12.74%	12.84%	17.07%	4.56%	-19.18%	56.40%	-5.73%	22.82%	-17.13%	12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between HLFNX and RMBKX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.75

The correlation between HLFNX and RMBKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HLFNX vs. RMBKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLFNX

HLFNX Risk / Return Rank: 8
HLFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
HLFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
HLFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
HLFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HLFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

RMBKX

RMBKX Risk / Return Rank: 58
RMBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RMBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
RMBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RMBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RMBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLFNX vs. RMBKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HLFNX	RMBKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	1.91	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	2.68	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.34	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	4.16	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.76	11.11	-9.34

HLFNX vs. RMBKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLFNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the RMBKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLFNX and RMBKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HLFNX vs. RMBKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLFNX drawdown since its inception was -71.74%, which is greater than RMBKX's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFNX and RMBKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLFNX	RMBKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.74%	-55.45%	-16.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.44%	-9.48%	-8.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.02%	-24.98%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.03%	-44.33%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.03%	-55.45%	+11.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.78%	-1.90%	-2.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.26%	-11.04%	-10.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.53%	3.54%	+3.99%

Volatility

HLFNX vs. RMBKX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLFNX	RMBKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	5.35%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.67%	13.74%	+0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.84%	20.63%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.92%	24.82%	-0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.21%	27.17%	-2.96%

HLFNX vs. RMBKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLFNX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBKX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLFNX vs. RMBKX - Dividend Comparison

HLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than RMBKX's 5.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLFNX Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund	7.96%	7.92%	0.56%	1.72%	7.39%	5.16%	0.00%	0.00%	3.15%	4.60%	0.54%	10.23%
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund	5.52%	6.22%	1.90%	1.29%	17.29%	1.35%	0.00%	0.85%	5.39%	6.63%	1.50%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLFNX and RMBKX in my portfolio?

HLFNX and RMBKX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HLFNX or RMBKX?

RMBKX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to HLFNX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLFNX dropped -71.74% vs RMBKX's -55.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMBKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.