PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLAL vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLAL vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.31% return.


HLAL

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.95%
6M
14.97%
YTD
17.14%
1Y
33.46%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.27%

TPYP

1D
-1.47%
1M
0.33%
6M
10.96%
YTD
20.31%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
18.93%
10Y*
11.32%
ALL TIME*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.03M$3.52M$4.35M
$2.68M$2.32M$2.66M

HLAL vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
17.14%18.30%16.70%30.13%-17.56%28.64%24.65%10.61%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.31%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%-1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between HLAL and TPYP is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.41

The correlation between HLAL and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HLAL vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HLAL
TPYP

Technology

57.0%

-

Communication Services

13.8%

-

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Industrials

5.1%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%

-

Energy

3.9%
69.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Utilities

0.2%
21.2%

Financial Services

0.0%
2.4%

Technology

HLAL
57.0%
TPYP

-

Communication Services

HLAL
13.8%
TPYP

-

Healthcare

HLAL
9.6%
TPYP

-

Industrials

HLAL
5.1%
TPYP
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HLAL
5.0%
TPYP

-

Energy

HLAL
3.9%
TPYP
69.6%

Consumer Defensive

HLAL
2.6%
TPYP

-

Basic Materials

HLAL
2.1%
TPYP
0.1%

Real Estate

HLAL
0.8%
TPYP

-

Utilities

HLAL
0.2%
TPYP
21.2%

Financial Services

HLAL
0.0%
TPYP
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLAL vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HLAL
HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HLAL vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLALTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.25

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

7.64

+4.46

HLAL vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLAL and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLAL vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLALTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-51.91%

+18.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-6.84%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-13.17%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-17.96%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-5.54%

+4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-7.82%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.91%

-0.14%

Volatility

HLAL vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLALTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

4.74%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

11.18%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

13.98%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

17.41%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

21.90%

-1.66%

HLAL vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLAL vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than TPYP's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.45%0.53%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.28%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLAL and TPYP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLAL has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLAL dropped -33.57% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

On 5-year performance, TPYP leads with 18.93% vs 14.01% for HLAL. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 18.93% return vs 14.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.45% for HLAL.

HLAL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TPYP is MLPs. HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HLAL and 0.40% for TPYP.

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLAL and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer