HLAL vs. TPYP
HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HLAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE Shariah USA Index, while TPYP is a MLPs fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HLAL returned 14.01%/yr vs 18.93%/yr for TPYP. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HLAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
HLAL vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.31% return.
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 33.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.27%
TPYP
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 18.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.03M | $3.52M | $4.35M | |
| $2.68M | $2.32M | $2.66M |
HLAL vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 17.14% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.61% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.31% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | -1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLAL and TPYP is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.41 |
The correlation between HLAL and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HLAL vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HLAL
TPYP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
Technology
HLAL
TPYP
-
Communication Services
HLAL
TPYP
-
Healthcare
HLAL
TPYP
-
Industrials
HLAL
TPYP
Consumer Cyclical
HLAL
TPYP
-
Energy
HLAL
TPYP
Consumer Defensive
HLAL
TPYP
-
Basic Materials
HLAL
TPYP
Real Estate
HLAL
TPYP
-
Utilities
HLAL
TPYP
Financial Services
HLAL
TPYP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLAL vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
HLAL
TPYP
HLAL vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HLAL | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.27 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.25 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 7.64 | +4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HLAL vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLAL | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -51.91% | +18.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -6.84% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.67% | -13.17% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | -17.96% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -5.54% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -7.82% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.91% | -0.14% |
Volatility
HLAL vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLAL | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 4.74% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 11.18% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 13.98% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 17.41% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 21.90% | -1.66% |
HLAL vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HLAL vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than TPYP's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.45% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.28% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLAL and TPYP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLAL has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLAL dropped -33.57% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 5-year performance, TPYP leads with 18.93% vs 14.01% for HLAL. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 18.93% return vs 14.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.45% for HLAL.
HLAL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TPYP is MLPs. HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HLAL and 0.40% for TPYP.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLAL and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer