HLAL vs. OUSA
HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HLAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE Shariah USA Index, while OUSA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HLAL returned 13.58%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for OUSA. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HLAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSA.
Performance
HLAL vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 14.82% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 7.09% return.
HLAL
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- YTD
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.95%
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.61M | $3.52M | $4.38M | |
| $872.37K | $1.31M | $1.44M |
HLAL vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 14.82% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.61% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 7.09% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 6.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLAL and OUSA is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HLAL and OUSA has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HLAL vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HLAL
OUSA
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Technology
HLAL
OUSA
Communication Services
HLAL
OUSA
Healthcare
HLAL
OUSA
Industrials
HLAL
OUSA
Consumer Cyclical
HLAL
OUSA
Energy
HLAL
OUSA
-
Consumer Defensive
HLAL
OUSA
Basic Materials
HLAL
OUSA
-
Real Estate
HLAL
OUSA
-
Utilities
HLAL
OUSA
-
Financial Services
HLAL
OUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLAL vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
HLAL
OUSA
HLAL vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HLAL | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 1.95 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 6.80 | +4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HLAL vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, roughly equal to the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and OUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLAL | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -33.12% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -8.36% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.67% | -13.14% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | -19.54% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -0.23% | -3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -3.50% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.39% | +0.38% |
Volatility
HLAL vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.65%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLAL | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 3.65% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 8.12% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 10.25% | +5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.93% | 13.38% | +4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 15.19% | +5.04% |
HLAL vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
HLAL vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than OUSA's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.45% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLAL and OUSA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLAL has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to OUSA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLAL dropped -33.57% vs OUSA's -33.12%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 13.58% vs 8.96% for OUSA. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.45% for HLAL.
HLAL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HLAL and 0.48% for OUSA.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLAL and OUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer