PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLAL vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLAL vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 14.82% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 7.09% return.


HLAL

1D
1.73%
1M
1.15%
6M
11.49%
YTD
14.82%
1Y
32.26%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.95%

OUSA

1D
0.53%
1M
2.40%
6M
3.84%
YTD
7.09%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
10.40%
ALL TIME*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.61M$3.52M$4.38M
$872.37K$1.31M$1.44M

HLAL vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
14.82%18.30%16.70%30.13%-17.56%28.64%24.65%10.61%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
7.09%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HLAL and OUSA is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between HLAL and OUSA has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HLAL vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HLAL
OUSA

Technology

57.0%
23.7%

Communication Services

13.8%
10.3%

Healthcare

9.6%
15.1%

Industrials

5.1%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
13.1%

Energy

3.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
7.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
18.6%

Technology

HLAL
57.0%
OUSA
23.7%

Communication Services

HLAL
13.8%
OUSA
10.3%

Healthcare

HLAL
9.6%
OUSA
15.1%

Industrials

HLAL
5.1%
OUSA
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HLAL
5.0%
OUSA
13.1%

Energy

HLAL
3.9%
OUSA

-

Consumer Defensive

HLAL
2.6%
OUSA
7.4%

Basic Materials

HLAL
2.1%
OUSA

-

Real Estate

HLAL
0.8%
OUSA

-

Utilities

HLAL
0.2%
OUSA

-

Financial Services

HLAL
0.0%
OUSA
18.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLAL vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HLAL
HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HLAL vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLALOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.95

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

6.80

+4.87

HLAL vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLAL and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLAL vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, roughly equal to the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLALOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-33.12%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-8.36%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-13.14%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-19.54%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.36%

-0.23%

-3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-3.50%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.39%

+0.38%

Volatility

HLAL vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.65%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLALOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

3.65%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.66%

8.12%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

10.25%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

13.38%

+4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

15.19%

+5.04%

HLAL vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLAL vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than OUSA's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.45%0.53%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.35%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLAL and OUSA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLAL has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to OUSA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLAL dropped -33.57% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 13.58% vs 8.96% for OUSA. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.45% for HLAL.

HLAL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HLAL and 0.48% for OUSA.

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLAL and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer