PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLAL vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLAL vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


HLAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
9.45%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.75%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLAL vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
18.72%18.30%16.70%30.13%-17.56%28.64%24.65%10.96%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HLAL and BBUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.95

The correlation between HLAL and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

HLAL vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HLAL
BBUS

Technology

50.4%
37.1%

Communication Services

16.7%
10.8%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
9.4%

Industrials

4.6%
7.2%

Energy

4.5%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.5%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.2%

Utilities

1.0%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.7%

Financial Services

0.0%
10.8%

Technology

HLAL
50.4%
BBUS
37.1%

Communication Services

HLAL
16.7%
BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

HLAL
10.5%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HLAL
5.6%
BBUS
9.4%

Industrials

HLAL
4.6%
BBUS
7.2%

Energy

HLAL
4.5%
BBUS
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

HLAL
2.9%
BBUS
4.5%

Basic Materials

HLAL
2.5%
BBUS
1.2%

Utilities

HLAL
1.0%
BBUS
2.6%

Real Estate

HLAL
0.8%
BBUS
1.7%

Financial Services

HLAL
0.0%
BBUS
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLAL vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLAL
HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLAL vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLALBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.42

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

3.00

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.85

13.76

+6.09

HLAL vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLAL Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLAL and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLALBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

2.33

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.79

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.84

+0.06

Drawdowns

HLAL vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLALBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-35.35%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-9.21%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-19.01%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-25.46%

+2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.74%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-5.46%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.00%

+0.20%

Volatility

HLAL vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLALBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

2.88%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

8.96%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

11.87%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

17.03%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

19.59%

+0.62%

HLAL vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLAL vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.44%0.53%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, HLAL and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLAL dropped -33.57% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.

HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HLAL and 0.02% for BBUS.

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLAL and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer