HL vs. XLE
HL (Hecla Mining Company) is a stock, while XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, HL returned 14.62%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for XLE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HL vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -13.10% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 14.62%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.
HL
- 1D
- -6.35%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -13.10%
- 6M
- -3.94%
- 1Y
- 189.25%
- 3Y*
- 45.57%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
HL vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -13.10% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and XLE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.29 |
The correlation between HL and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
HL
XLE
HL vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.75 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 10.92 | -2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.21 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.79 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.35 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.31 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
HL vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -71.26% | -26.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.56% | -12.05% | -36.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.56% | -20.14% | -28.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.18% | -26.04% | -37.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | -66.81% | -15.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.57% | -6.15% | -41.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.95% | -17.98% | -51.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.18% | 4.14% | +19.04% |
Volatility
HL vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 22.42% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.42% | 8.25% | +14.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.84% | 16.58% | +37.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.57% | 20.53% | +51.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.06% | 26.02% | +33.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.65% | 29.59% | +33.06% |
Dividends
HL vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and XLE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (22.42%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs XLE's -71.26%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer