HL vs. XLE
HL (Hecla Mining Company) is a stock, while XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, HL returned 9.28%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for XLE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HL vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -24.31% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HL having a 9.28% annualized return and XLE not far ahead at 9.47%.
HL
- 1D
- -6.08%
- 1M
- -13.16%
- 6M
- -42.40%
- YTD
- -24.31%
- 1Y
- 141.48%
- 3Y*
- 35.43%
- 5Y*
- 17.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
XLE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 36.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
HL vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -24.31% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.29% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and XLE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.29 |
The correlation between HL and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
HL
XLE
HL vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.45 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 6.58 | -1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HL vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -71.26% | -26.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.81% | -14.98% | -40.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.81% | -20.14% | -35.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.81% | -26.04% | -29.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | -66.81% | -15.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -8.20% | -46.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.89% | -17.95% | -51.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.86% | 5.57% | +23.29% |
Volatility
HL vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 6.10%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 6.10% | +9.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.58% | 16.65% | +35.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.27% | 20.96% | +52.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.47% | 25.87% | +33.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.81% | 29.58% | +33.23% |
Dividends
HL vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than XLE's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.66% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and XLE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to XLE (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs XLE's -71.26%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer