HL vs. SLVP

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

HL (Hecla Mining Company) is a stock, while SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, HL returned 11.45%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for SLVP. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

HL vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hecla Mining Company (HL) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -19.56% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's -9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has outperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 11.45%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.

HL

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -13.17%
• YTD: -19.56%
• 6M: -20.80%
• 1Y: 157.90%
• 3Y*: 44.78%
• 5Y*: 16.35%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

SLVP

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -16.43%
• YTD: -9.65%
• 6M: -11.21%
• 1Y: 76.85%
• 3Y*: 49.15%
• 5Y*: 16.22%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HL vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HL Hecla Mining Company	-19.56%	291.70%	2.82%	-12.93%	6.99%	-18.97%	91.83%	44.43%	-40.37%	-24.08%
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF	-9.65%	202.84%	14.47%	-2.31%	-18.06%	-23.53%	56.45%	37.71%	-22.10%	4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HL and SLVP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012	0.81

The correlation between HL and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HL vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HL

HL Risk / Return Rank: 85
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

SLVP

SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 42
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HL vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HL	SLVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.39	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.83	+0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.24	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.03	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.91	4.88	+1.03

HL vs. SLVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and SLVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HL vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and SLVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	HL	SLVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.92%	-80.47%	-17.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.81%	-38.06%	-17.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.81%	-38.06%	-17.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.81%	-48.01%	-7.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.45%	-62.03%	-20.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.47%	-34.83%	-16.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.91%	-46.74%	-23.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.84%	15.80%	+11.04%

Volatility

HL vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 21.36% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 19.38%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HL	SLVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.36%	19.38%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.58%	45.84%	+8.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.45%	55.46%	+17.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.39%	43.37%	+16.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.83%	42.51%	+20.32%

Dividends

HL vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SLVP's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HL Hecla Mining Company	0.10%	0.08%	0.81%	0.65%	0.40%	0.72%	0.25%	0.29%	0.42%	0.25%	0.19%	0.53%
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF	2.28%	1.78%	1.05%	0.88%	0.63%	1.63%	2.39%	2.03%	1.28%	0.85%	2.32%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HL and SLVP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, HL and SLVP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HL or SLVP?

HL has higher volatility (21.36%) compared to SLVP (19.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs SLVP's -80.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.