HL vs. OPRX
HL (Hecla Mining Company) and OPRX (OptimizeRx Corporation) are both stocks. HL operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while OPRX operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, HL returned 8.43%/yr vs 18.70%/yr for OPRX. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HL vs. OPRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -26.39% return, which is significantly higher than OPRX's -50.65% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has underperformed OPRX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while OPRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.70% annualized return.
HL
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -9.43%
- 6M
- -37.28%
- YTD
- -26.39%
- 1Y
- 146.28%
- 3Y*
- 37.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.08%
OPRX
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- -43.77%
- YTD
- -50.65%
- 1Y
- -52.06%
- 3Y*
- -24.56%
- 5Y*
- -35.75%
- 10Y*
- 18.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $675.62M | $596.53M | $453.27M | |
| $1.30M | $1.68M | $2.32M |
HL vs. OPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -26.39% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
OPRX OptimizeRx Corporation | -50.65% | 152.26% | -66.04% | -14.82% | -72.95% | 99.33% | 203.41% | -6.38% | 598.73% | 93.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and OPRX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.08 |
The correlation between HL and OPRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HL:
$9.47B
OPRX:
$113.53M
HL:
$0.83
OPRX:
$0.36
HL:
17.01
OPRX:
16.86
HL:
0.07
OPRX:
0.03
HL:
6.05
OPRX:
1.07
HL:
3.71
OPRX:
0.88
HL:
$1.57B
OPRX:
$107.35M
HL:
$788.95M
OPRX:
$70.86M
HL:
$864.40M
OPRX:
$16.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. OPRX — Risk / Return Rank
HL
OPRX
HL vs. OPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HL | OPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.90 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | -0.66 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | -0.99 | +5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HL vs. OPRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, roughly equal to the maximum OPRX drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and OPRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | OPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -99.32% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.81% | -79.06% | +23.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.81% | -79.06% | +23.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.81% | -96.10% | +40.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | -96.10% | +13.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.59% | -93.83% | +38.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.88% | -60.80% | -9.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.92% | 52.76% | -21.84% |
Volatility
HL vs. OPRX - Volatility Comparison
Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 17.22% compared to OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) at 9.79%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | OPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.22% | 9.79% | +7.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.30% | 53.13% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.85% | 77.74% | -3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.58% | 76.03% | -16.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 114.58% | -51.79% |
Dividends
HL vs. OPRX - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while OPRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.11% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
OPRX OptimizeRx Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HL vs. OPRX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and OptimizeRx Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HL vs. OPRX - Profitability Comparison
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
OPRX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OptimizeRx Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.93M and revenue of 19.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
OPRX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OptimizeRx Corporation reported an operating income of 396.00K and revenue of 19.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
OPRX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OptimizeRx Corporation reported a net income of -495.00K and revenue of 19.84M, resulting in a net margin of -2.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and OPRX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (17.22%) compared to OPRX (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs OPRX's -99.32%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and OPRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer