HL vs. NICE
HL (Hecla Mining Company) and NICE (NICE Ltd.) are both stocks. HL operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, HL returned 10.98%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for NICE. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HL vs. NICE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -17.53% return, which is significantly lower than NICE's -11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has outperformed NICE with an annualized return of 10.98%, while NICE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.49% annualized return.
HL
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- 6M
- -29.50%
- YTD
- -17.53%
- 1Y
- 150.61%
- 3Y*
- 44.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
NICE
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 13.24%
- 6M
- -14.80%
- YTD
- -11.77%
- 1Y
- -35.59%
- 3Y*
- -21.22%
- 5Y*
- -17.19%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
HL vs. NICE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -17.53% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | -11.77% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -36.66% | 7.07% | 82.75% | 43.38% | 17.73% | 33.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and NICE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 1996 | 0.14 |
The correlation between HL and NICE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HL:
$10.61B
NICE:
$5.84B
HL:
$0.83
NICE:
$8.52
HL:
19.05
NICE:
11.70
HL:
0.08
NICE:
0.35
HL:
6.77
NICE:
2.06
HL:
4.15
NICE:
1.64
HL:
$1.57B
NICE:
$3.01B
HL:
$788.95M
NICE:
$1.98B
HL:
$864.40M
NICE:
$841.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. NICE — Risk / Return Rank
HL
NICE
HL vs. NICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and NICE Ltd. (NICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HL | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.87 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | -0.76 | +3.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | -1.20 | +7.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HL vs. NICE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than NICE's maximum drawdown of -93.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and NICE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -93.23% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.81% | -51.19% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.81% | -68.21% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.81% | -73.60% | +17.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | -73.60% | -8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.25% | -68.34% | +18.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.90% | -35.27% | -34.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.11% | 32.47% | -4.36% |
Volatility
HL vs. NICE - Volatility Comparison
Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 17.79% compared to NICE Ltd. (NICE) at 10.16%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | NICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.79% | 10.16% | +7.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.33% | 42.52% | +10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.28% | 51.48% | +21.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.43% | 39.92% | +19.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.82% | 33.27% | +29.55% |
Dividends
HL vs. NICE - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while NICE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
Financials
HL vs. NICE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and NICE Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HL vs. NICE - Profitability Comparison
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
NICE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
NICE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
NICE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and NICE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (17.79%) compared to NICE (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs NICE's -93.23%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and NICE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer